A NETWORK of pro-democracy organisations has launched a major overhaul of “hyper-centralised” local democracy in Scotland as new polling reveals a stark divide between voters and councils.
The Our Democracy coalition, led by the Electoral Reform Society (ERS) Scotland, wants “genuine local democracy” on the agenda for this election, following calls from Scotland’s Citizens’ Assembly to let people decide how they are governed locally.
Now the coalition has urged new powers for local communities to set up Citizens’ Assemblies to hold councils to account, and not only at election time.
Scotland has some of the largest and most distant councils in Europe and the network said people feel geographically and politically distanced from them. Parties need the “trust in communities” thinking that got us through the pandemic, with a bold Local Democracy Bill
Our Democracy has launched a declaration backed by community groups across Scotland calling for a new way of doing local democracy, to allow communities a proper say in how we rebuild post-Covid. They are urging people to sign up to push parties into action.
Polling for the group’s launch by Savanta ComRes revealed a crisis of representation at a local level, with voters feeling sidelined and powerless.
Two-thirds of people surveyed (67%) felt they have little or no influence over decisions that affect their local community; only 5% of respondents felt they have a lot of influence; and around a fifth (18%) said they had some influence.
Our Democracy’s petition went live today, backed by mutual aid and community groups across Scotland.
Willie Sullivan, director of ERS Scotland, said: “The pandemic has given us a glimpse of what this polling tells us people want and need. Communities coming together to make decisions for themselves not only makes better decisions but these very acts strengthen the bonds of caring and support. Then people feel that they ‘can do’ and that they have the power to do.
“This is ‘strength training’ for Scotland’s democratic muscle.”
Evie Love, founder of Earth In Common, added: “Local democracy should of course be fully embraced, this is vitally important for healthy communities. People do tend to
know what solutions are needed in their local area.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here