PEOPLE with a severe mental illness are more likely to die following a heart attack than those without a psychiatric diagnosis, new research has suggested.
Experts at Edinburgh University examined anonymous hospital data for more than 235,000 people admitted for heart attacks in Scotland from 1991 to 2014.
They compared the risks of death and further heart attacks and strokes among heart attack patients with schizophrenia, major depression or bipolar disorder to patients without a history of mental illness.
The research team found that people with one of these three conditions were more likely to die within 30 days, one year and five years, and to have another heart attack or stroke, compared to those without ill mental health.
After 30 days, patients with schizophrenia were twice as likely to have died and patients with bipolar disorder or major depression had a 30%-50% increased risk of death.
People with severe mental illness were also less likely to receive revascularisation – an operation to restore blood flow – which researchers say may indicate differences in care.
Researchers say the findings may be due to a number of reasons including poor general health, social exclusion and possible differences in longer-term treatment, and are calling for disparities to be urgently addressed.
Dr Caroline Jackson, lead researcher at Edinburgh’s University Usher Institute, said: “This study highlights marked and persistent mental health inequalities in heart attack outcomes in Scotland.
“The underlying reason is likely to be multi-factorial and complex, and remains poorly understood.
“We need to know how comorbidities and lifestyle factors contribute to these disparities.
“We also need detailed investigation of the entire patient journey, from heart attack onset to rehabilitation among people with severe mental illness, to identify any areas of weakness in clinical care.”
The researchers found no evidence of any improvement across the 24-year period up to 2014 examined in the study.
They advise that people with mental health conditions should continue to seek advice from their medical team if they have any concerns about their health.
The study was funded by the Scottish Government’s Chief Scientist Office and is published in the journal BMC Medicine.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here