ALEX Salmond’s claim that Nicola Sturgeon’s staff leaked the name of one of the women who complained about the former First Minister’s behaviour has been corroborated by an ex-civil servant.
In written evidence, Lorraine Kay told the Holyrood inquiry that a complainer’s identity had been shared with Geoff Aberdein, Salmond’s chief of staff.
Kay, who worked in the former FM's private office for five years, is the third person to back up Salmond’s statement that a government official revealed the name of one of the women who had come forward with an allegation.
READ MORE: John Swinney addresses Tory MP David Davis's allegations against SNP
Written evidence from Duncan Hamilton QC and the SNP’s former communications director, Kevin Pringle, confirmed Aberdein told them a complainer’s name was shared with him.
In a letter to the committee examining the Government’s unlawful investigation of Salmond, but redacted by the Scottish Parliament, Kay wrote: “I can confirm that Geoff confided in me, back in early March 2018, at the time when [redacted] requested a meeting with him.
“I met with Geoff after his meeting with [redacted], and was shocked to hear that the Scottish Government had received two complaints about Mr Salmond.
“Geoff also shared with me that [redacted] had named one of the complainants – I recall this clearly as I knew the individual concerned.
“I believe I was the first person Geoff spoke to about this issue.”
Nicola Sturgeon, who was not at the meeting where the name was allegedly shared, has argued that the name was not leaked.
When she was challenged about the claims at FMQs last month, Sturgeon said: “To the very best of my knowledge, I do not think that happened.”
Speaking under oath during her evidence session before the committee, Sturgeon said: “The account that I have been given has given me assurance that what is alleged to have happened at that meeting did not happen in the way that has been described.”
READ MORE: Alex Salmond contradicts Nicola Sturgeon over sharing of complainer's identity
She suggested that Salmond may have already known the name of one of the complainers “because he had apologised to the person concerned” and had possibly discovered the identity of the other “through his own investigations”.
Salmond was acquitted on all charges by a jury in March 2020. In a separate legal case, the Scottish Government’s botched handling of complaints against him ultimately cost the taxpayer more than £500,000.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel