JOHN Swinney has denied claims that a partial return of secondary school pupils to the classroom today was “politically motivated”, with the Scottish Government seeking a “good news story”.
In response to the claims from a senior teaching union official, the Education Secretary said the Government’s “sole motivation” was ensuring pupils’ wellbeing.
Nicola Sturgeon announced on March 2 that all pupils would have some time in school from today.
The remaining primary pupils, P4-P7, all return, with secondary school pupils making a partial return to the classroom through a blended learning model also involving home schooling.
The assistant secretary of the EIS teaching union, Andrea Bradley, told BBC Scotland’s Sunday Show: “The decision seemed to be a political one rather than one that was based on sound educational principle.
“Certainly it wasn’t one that has taken account of the very real circumstances in which teachers are working – under quite significant stress and pressure over the last six months.”
She said teachers are “really struggling” with the workload.
She added: “We have to have cognisance of the context in which the decision was announced, it took place before the parliamentary evidence-giving session.
“Our sense was the Government were looking for a good news story that week.”
The day after making the announcement, the First Minister gave evidence at the Holyrood committee examining the Scottish Government’s botched handling of sexual harassment claims against former first minister Alex Salmond.
Scottish Conservative education spokesperson Jamie Greene said: “It is startling to hear a senior teaching union official effectively accuse Nicola Sturgeon of using Scotland’s school pupils for political distraction.
“The suggestion appears to be that the First Minister announced an earlier return to the classroom not for legitimate reasons but to draw attention away from her evidence to the Salmond inquiry.”
Swinney told the same programme: “We were concerned about wellbeing of S1 to S3 pupils, who might feel excluded from the return to school if we didn’t give them some opportunity for face-to-face learning before the Easter holidays.
“That was the one and only motivation that the Government had.”
He added: “I’ve listened to young people directly myself who are concerned about the effects on their own wellbeing of the loss of social interaction with their peers and with their teachers.
“So that’s why all secondary pupils are returning for some elements of education and face-to-face learning in the forthcoming few weeks.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel