BORIS Johnson has defended NHS England’s Test and Trace scheme, which could end up costing the taxpayer £37 billion, after MPs said there was “no clear evidence” it cut coronavirus infections.
During Prime Minister’s Questions, Boris Johnson backed the programme, telling MPs: “It’s thanks to NHS Test and Trace that we’re able to send kids back to school and begin cautiously and irreversibly to reopen our economy and restart our lives.”
It comes after Health Secretary Matt Hancock said he believed the team behind Test and Trace had done “an amazing job”.
Hancock told the BBC: “The team have built this testing capacity from nothing a year ago and so they’ve done an amazing job and I’m incredibly grateful to them.”
Last week, Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s Budget included an additional £15bn for Test and Trace, taking the total bill to more than £37bn over two years.
But a report from the Commons’ Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has called on the Government to justify the “staggering investment” of taxpayers’ money.
It also urged the scheme, led by Tory peer Dido Harding, to “wean itself off” reliance on thousands of “expensive” consultants and temporary staff, with some receiving £6624 per day.
The PAC said the programme does publish a significant amount of weekly data, including some that shows full compliance with the self-isolation rules relied upon by the scheme can be low.
But it criticised the data for failing to show the speed of the process from “cough to contact” and therefore not allowing the public to judge the “overall effectiveness of the programme”.
READ MORE: PMQs sketch: Labour miss an open goal by fumbling questions on NHS pay
MPs also criticised the scheme for struggling to consistently match supply and demand for the service, and therefore “resulting in either sub-standard performance or surplus capacity”.
They said it remained “overly reliant” on contractors and temporary staff after having to initially act quickly to scale up the service rapidly.
The report said the scheme admitted that last month it still employs around 2500 consultants, at an estimated daily rate of around £1100, with the best paid consultancy staff on £6624.
“It is concerning that the DHSC [Department of Health and Social Care] is still paying such amounts – which it considers to be ‘very competitive rates’ to so many consultants,” the report said.
Labour’s shadow chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, Rachel Reeves, said the report shows the significantly outsourced system has “failed the British people and led our country into restrictive lockdown after lockdown”.
She added: “It underlines the epic amounts of waste and incompetence, an over-reliance on management consultants, taxpayers’ cash splashed on crony contracts – all while ministers insist our NHS heroes deserve nothing more than a clap and a pay cut.”
Royal College of Nursing general secretary Dame Donna Kinnair said nurses “will be furious to hear of the millions of pounds being spent on private sector consultants”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel