A THIRD tranche of legal advice to the Scottish Government over the Alex Salmond inquiry reveals that counsel were concerned about internal communications and what they might reveal.
Deputy First Minister John Swinney said the release yesterday of the latest documents “comprehensively disproves” claims that they had carried on with the case despite legal advice.
However, a letter from Roddy Dunlop QC and Christine O’Neill to the Government noted: “The petitioner may apply to the Court for an order requiring disclosure of information relating to the process by which Ms A and Ms B first approached Scottish Government and eventually made their formal complaints about the petitioner.
“If that order was granted it would be necessary to disclose internal emails and notes concerning that issue.
“We have advised that there is certain material we have seen that might, if recovered, be used by the petitioner to attempt to impugn the integrity of the process.”
The same letter went on to reveal for the first time that the two original complainers were each given sight of the draft procedure for handling complaints. It reads: “We note from the material provided to us today that in the informal discussions that took place with Ms A and Ms B in December 2017 they were given sight of the draft Procedure (as it then was) for their views on whether it would have been a helpful process for them to have had access to in 2013.
“The petitioner might, if that was known, seek to argue that it was unfair that the complainers were invited to comment on the Procedure at a time when they were considering making complaints that would be dealt with under that Procedure.”
Swinney said the advice had been released in recognition of the “overwhelming public interest in rebutting the false allegations made about the advice informing decision-making in the judicial review”.
He said: “These documents are clear. Our legal advice was optimistic about the Government’s prospects for success at the start. It became gradually but progressively less optimistic over time.
“It was only in December that the advice concluded that our case was no longer stateable and we should concede. Indeed, as late as 11 December, ministers were advised that we should continue.
“Within a matter of days of being advised that the case was not stateable, we have taken the decision to concede. That was right and proper.
“Significantly, however, this comprehensively disproves claims that we had continued the case in defiance of legal advice. That is categorically untrue and these documents put that beyond doubt.”
A source close to Salmond said: “We note that John Swinney has slipped out this evidence on a Friday afternoon, two days after the First Minister gave her evidence.
“No wonder, as the November 3 letter from Roddy Dunlop QC and Christine O’Neil QC confirms that there was ‘certain material’ which ‘if recovered’ could damage the Government’s case.
“Is the Committee and the public ever going to see all that material?”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel