DRINKING habits of men have been changed more than those of women by minimum unit pricing and other policies targeting the cost of alcohol, a study suggests.
Researchers at Glasgow University tested a range of pricing policies and found that men’s alcohol consumption and purchasing patterns are more likely to be influenced by cost, compared to those of women.
The study, published yesterday, indicates high-risk drinkers’ consumption fell by more than that of moderate drinkers when alcohol prices are increased by tax rises or minimum unit pricing – a policy introduced in Scotland in 2018.
The ultimate health outcome of a 50p minimum unit price is estimated to lead to a sevenfold larger reduction in consumption and a three times larger reduction in hospital admissions for men compared to women, the study found. Modelling of 50p and 70p minimum unit pricing, and a 10% increase in tax, also found women would cut down on their drinking less than men and their spending on alcohol would increase significantly more.
Consequently, reductions in alcohol-related hospital admissions are also estimated to be substantially larger among men than women.
Professor of Public Health at Glasgow University, Petra Meier, said: “We know that on average, men drink and spend about twice as much on alcohol than women, and have just over twice the rates of hospital admissions.
“Although men and women face similar risks from drinking at moderate levels, women actually face a substantially greater risk of health harm when drinking heavily.
“Before our study, we had no evidence on whether some of the most discussed policy options, alcohol duty and minimum pricing policies, work differently for men and
women.
On the importance of the study, she added: “If policymakers know that pricing policies are likely to have greater effects on men than women then they can decide if this is desirable.
“For example, in the UK one might argue that policies are well targeted because rates of alcohol-related harm are much higher in men than women.
“On the other hand, the smaller effects on consumption and implications for household budgets when female heavy drinkers increase their spending on alcohol may be seen as a concern.
“Knowing about differential impacts also allows policymakers to consider what other policies should form part of a comprehensive alcohol strategy.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here