HOLYROOD has unanimously passed reforms of defamation law after MSPs were told current legislation for this was “no longer fit for purpose”.
Community safety minister Ash Denham said the changes being brought in by the Scottish Government would make the law “fit for the 21st century”.
She told how the Defamation and Malicious Publication (Scotland) Bill – which was passed by 118 votes to zero – aims to both simplify and modernise the law on defamation, while also ensuring that a “better balance is struck” between the competing rights of freedom of expression and protecting someone’s reputation.
Denham said: “The law of defamation in Scotland is due for reform, the last substantive changes were made more than a generation ago and it is no longer fit for purpose.”
The Bill sets out, for the first time in Scots law, what constitutes a defamatory statement.
And a new threshold test of serious harm means that the “courts should not be asked to settle defamation litigation where there is little or no harm caused to individual reputation”, the minister added.
READ MORE: Holyrood election not delayed over Covid but results expected later
The Bill brings together the main defences against defamation – that something is true, an honest opinion or its publication is in the public interest.
But Denham said that one “innovative change” here is when the defence of honest opinion is used, facts need to be shown “underpinning the opinion to be either true, privileged, or reasonably believed to be true”.
She also said that having all the defences set out in one place would help people to “better understand the law”.
The Bill also increases the remedies available to those who have been defamed, with pursuers able to ask the courts to remove the offending items or attach a notice to them correcting it.
Those taking action will also be able to ask for a summary of the judgment to be published.
Denham stated: “Ultimately, for most, the purpose of a defamation court action is to vindicate unfairly damaged reputation and having new types of remedy that can achieve this is a welcome reform.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here