A TORY MSP has caused a social media storm after he launched an attack on the Deputy First Minister on Twitter yesterday evening.
Adam Tomkins, who won his Holyrood seat on the Glasgow list and will be stepping down in May, tweeted the attack on John Swinney after the SNP minister U-turned on the decision not to publish legal advice given to the Scottish Government around the botched handling of complaints against Alex Salmond.
The case, which Salmond ultimately won, cost the taxpayer more than half a million pounds. Calls for the Scottish Government to publish the legal advice it received in the run up to that court ruling came to a head yesterday.
All four of the opposition parties in Holyrood signalled they would support a Tory motion of no confidence in Swinney in an effort to force the publication of the legal advice.
READ MORE: John Swinney: There were 'reservations' about Alex Salmond judicial review
The effort was successful and the Scottish Government agreed to publish the advice despite misgivings that doing would establish a bad precedent.
In the wake of Swinney’s U-turn, Tomkins took to Twitter to express his frustration.
The Tory MSP wrote: “Swinney does the right thing not because it’s the right thing to do but only because it’ll save his neck. Devious unscrupulous manipulative little man.”
The outburst did not go unnoticed on social media, with SNP councillor Mhairi Hunter tweeting a gif of a child throwing a tantrum in response.
— Mhairi Hunter (@MhairiHunter) March 1, 2021
The sentiment was echoed by SNP MP Chris Law, who asked: “Adam, how old are you?” followed by an emoji of a baby’s bottle.
Others highlighted how Tomkins’s issue seemed to be that the Tories had gotten their way. Pollster Mark McGeoghegan said the MSP “would rather have the scalp than the legal advice”.
A no-confidence vote would not have placed a legal obligation on Swinney to resign, but the pressure from opposition parties in its wake would have been immense.
READ MORE: Tory MSP Adam Tomkins panned after sending wrong email to constituent
Many of the Deputy First Minister’s SNP colleagues came to his defence, variously accusing Tomkins of resorting to a “personal”, “revolting”, and “contemptible” attack.
Carol Monaghan, the SNP MP for Glasgow North West, wrote: “I thought you better than this, Adam. John is a kind, honest and gracious man who is respected across the political spectrum.
“Who were you hoping to engage with a tweet such as this? Really disappointing.”
— Mhairi Hunter (@MhairiHunter) March 1, 2021
John Nicolson MP added: “What a revolting tweet. John Swinney - as friends and colleagues will tell you from across the political spectrum - is a thoroughly decent, kind, and honourable man. He is the last person deserving of this venom.”
SNP MP Stewart McDonald commented: “People from all political viewpoints will tell you what a decent, honourable and conscientious public servant John Swinney has been over his near 25 years in elected office. Adam’s political career - as unremarkable as it is blessedly short - stands in the shade by comparison.”
Drew Hendry MP wrote: “Anybody who has had any dealings with @JohnSwinney knows this is a contemptible comment to make.
“Across politics, at all levels, all parties and none, over many years, I have heard countless remarks of respect and friendship for him. This says more about Mr Tomkins than John.”
READ MORE: Tories are using the Salmond-Sturgeon debate as another way to attack devolution
MP Gavin Newlands wrote: “How disappointing. No matter how much I vehemently disagree with him on almost everything, I genuinely thought this personal nonsense was beneath Adam. How naive of me.”
Tomkins, who is also a professor at the University of Glasgow, responded to a comment from colleague Duncan Ross on the social media platform.
Ross, who is a Dean of Graduate Studies at the university, wrote: “Adam, this is beneath you. Disagree about politics and process if you will, but there is not a person in the Scottish Parliament with more integrity than John Swinney.”
Integrity?!
— Adam Tomkins MSP (@ProfTomkins) March 1, 2021
The man who told me I should be ashamed of asking him questions about his illegal and sinister named persons scheme?
The man who won’t publish the OECD review of the SNP’s disastrous mismanagement of schools until after the election?
This is honest John, is it? https://t.co/JiSg8dyumk
Responding, Tomkins wrote: “Integrity?! The man who told me I should be ashamed of asking him questions about his illegal and sinister named persons scheme?
“The man who won’t publish the OECD review of the SNP’s disastrous mismanagement of schools until after the election? This is honest John, is it?”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel