IT will be "near impossible" to eliminate Covid-19 in Scotland while the borders remain open, a health expert has suggested.
Dr Christine Tait-Burkard said Scotland and the UK as a whole is in a very different position to New Zealand and Australia where such strategies are "quite feasible".
She explained that those countries have the advantage of only being accessible after lengthy journeys by air or sea – whereas the UK has closer contact with the continent. It would be unrealistic to expect the virus to be completely eradicated in Scotland while “people can travel very easily” to the UK, the scientist added.
A panel of Scots convened by Holyrood's Covid-19 Committee has called for an elimination strategy to be put in place to fight the virus, which would see restrictions in place to slowly work the number of cases to zero, though the group accepts there would need to be an agreement across the UK.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon refuses to rule out closing Scotland-England border to stop Covid
Tait-Burkard, a research fellow in the department of infection and immunity at the University of Edinburgh's Roslin Institute, was asked whether she believes elimination is a feasible strategy.
Speaking on BBC Radio Scotland's Good Morning Scotland programme, she said: "It is a very difficult strategy to pursue and in my opinion it's near impossible, just because we live in a very multi-cultural society and have very close links to the continent.
"It's a bit different from Australia and New Zealand where these strategies are indeed quite feasible because the only ports are by air or by boat.
"With the UK those links are very close and people can travel very easily.
"On the other hand we are on a good way to having vaccinated a good proportion of the population and are making headway in increasing that, so potentially in my opinion we just have to start to live with the virus, carefully weighing out all the negatives but the reality of the virus being so widespread across the globe means that this virus is here to stay."
Asked whether eliminating the virus completely would mean the country being isolated for a prolonged period of time like New Zealand and Australia, Tait-Burkard added: "Indeed, and the same measures as we have seen in for instance Melbourne very recently, where we see that as soon as any cases occur if we're near that zero number we have very stringent lockdowns to really eliminate and control any spreading."
However she said it will be possible to get close to the position last year where infection levels fell drastically in the lead up to the summer holiday period.
READ MORE: LBC host says Nicola Sturgeon is 'talking out her kilt' on Scottish Border rules
Meanwhile, Professor Jason Leitch, the Scottish Government's national clinical director, told the same programme it is "possible to strive" for elimination.
"I think global elimination is a long, long way away," he explained.
"We can see countries striving very hard for elimination and getting there and then they get little blips. So you saw this week in Melbourne some people might have been watching the tennis with a crowd and then no crowd. So six days, five days of lockdown because they got a few cases.
"So elimination is not eradicating the virus. The virus, in order to be completely eradicated, would be a smallpox-style, many years project, and the virus would probably have to help us.
"But we can strive for elimination."
He praised the panel of citizens, saying: "Their recommendations are all excellent. I spent some time with them, they were full of questions, they wanted to deeply understand the pandemic and what happens next."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel