SOCIAL housing is a matter close to my heart because I personally experienced homelessness at one time in my life. Due to personal circumstances beyond my control, I also could not afford private rent, never mind a mortgage.
I know what it is like to have housing insecurity and to genuinely struggle to make ends meet during an immensely challenging time. Yet, I cannot imagine what it must be like to go through this during a public health emergency.
Housing is also at the very heart of this emergency as Covid has glaringly highlighted that quality housing is literally a matter of life and death. Even the current Scottish Government message is to stay at home. A home is not just a building, but a place of security, safety and stability, which all aid mental health. The need to prioritise the physical and mental health of our communities has never been more clear.
The Scottish Finance Minister has recently said Covid has “underlined the value of a safe, secure and affordable home”, yet she chose to cut investment in social and affordable homes by £268 million, as highlighted by Shelter Scotland. How can a decision to not invest in making sure everyone has a home be justified?
READ MORE: Call for Kate Forbes to prioritise affordable housing
Social housing is desperately needed in Scotland. There have been too many unaffordable homes built in the past decade and given the pandemic crisis we are going through, people need affordable housing more than ever.
I genuinely struggle to understand why MSPs, especially those on a ministerial wage and who claim to be in a centre-left party, deliberately chose to disinvest in social housebuilding; after all, not one MSP is priced out of a mortgage. How can they be comfortable with denying renters, including young professionals, who are priced out of mortgages because of funding landlords’ mortgages and lifestyles?
Renters are being robbed of the ability to pay for their own lifestyles and saving deposits for their own mortgages.
The Scottish Government should know better, especially when it’s very hard to miss the remarkable grassroots campaign from Living Rent (including the fabulous local Gorgie Dalry branch!), and Shelter Scotland, plus many others, to highlight this serious issue.
I expect this kind of political behaviour from the Tories as a central part of their ideology is to prioritise landowners, landlords, and the Airbnb lobby over struggling tenants. Renters being forced to pay a large share of their income to landlords is literally a wealth transfer from the poor to rich and has led to a cycle of spiralling inequality – the very essence of capitalism.
READ MORE: We must remember to learn from mistakes of the past when rebuilding communities
The SNP are a progressive centre-left party, so what is the Scottish Government’s excuse for cutting £268m investments in social and affordable homes? Are all SNP MSPs comfortable voting for this huge backward step? And what is the Scottish Government’s excuse for not making any effort to address the unworkable rent control bill which none of the local authorities in Scotland are able to implement?
Cutting the Scottish Budget in areas most needed is definitely not in the best interest of the people of Scotland or for creating an equal and inclusive country.
Ashley Graczyk is an independent councillor for the Sighthill-Gorgie ward in Edinburgh
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel