I AGREE wholeheartedly with the article by Joanna Cherry on care home visits (While one million vaccines is to be celebrated, there remain difficulties, February 12). Perhaps greater consideration should be given to what life means for older folk in care homes, when we prioritise preserving life.
All the efforts since March have been directed towards keeping them free from the virus and therefore alive. In many cases, however, that has meant only that they are kept breathing, sleeping, eating and sitting around, within the limits of the care home. Is that all that being alive is thought to consist of for them?
READ MORE: Joanna Cherry: Covid vaccine progress is tremendous, but other challenges remain
By the time they have to live in a care home, older folk have spent a lifetime of having their everyday lives conditioned and bounded by the world around them, in particular by their family and to a lesser extent by friends and others. Over time, the balance changes from others being dependent on them to their dependence on others until eventually, with age, they lose everything of that long life that made them who they are, except their family relationship.
To deprive them, therefore, of that last vestige of the person they have been and the life they have known for most of their time on this earth is to reduce life to the description above, so that they can spend longer in this isolated, non-person state, in the hope that they will, at some distant date, be reconnected with their family. Many will prefer simply turn their face to the wall and die, knowing that they are unlikely anyway to last that long. This is exactly what happened to an elderly friend from my childhood recently, who had lost the will to live when family were shut out and died, without symptoms, only a couple of days after being tested positive, but at least ten days after refusing to get up, dress or eat.
I realise that this is a real dilemma for care homes and governments, as they take criticism whether they do or don’t allow family visits, but perhaps we should start to regard family contact as an essential part of the care package to keep the elderly alive.
P Davidson
Falkirk
In the coming weeks, only subscribers will be able to comment on The National articles. Subscribe now or log in to make sure you stay a part of the conversation.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions. What should we do with our second vote in 2021? What happens if Westminster says no to indyref2?
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversation, register under fake names, and post vile abuse. We’ve had hundreds of emails from you complaining about this, asking us to take steps to ensure that these people aren’t given a platform on our site.
We’re listening to you, and here’s how we plan to make that happen.
We have decided to make the ability to comment only available to our 10,000 paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them.
We’ll be monitoring this change over the first few weeks, and we’re keen to know your thoughts. Email us at letters@thenational.scot if you want to have your say.
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Last Updated:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
Report This Comment