THE Scottish Government has been urged to revamp its heart disease strategy amid warnings that progress is stalling.
The last strategy was published in 2014 and set out six priorities for care, including improvements to reduce the chances of patients suffering cardiac arrest away from hospital and boosting access to services for congenital patients.
But the British Heart Foundation (BHF) says investment in the area has shrunk when compared to other diseases such as diabetes and cancer.
According to the charity, £117 million has been earmarked for a new cancer strategy while £42m has been similarly pledged for Type 2 diabetes.
David McColgan, senior policy and public affairs manager at BHF, said: “Heart disease is a major cause of ill health and death in Scotland and yet the Scottish Government’s plans to tackle heart disease haven’t been updated since 2014.
“During this time, there have been a lot of changes in the health care system, not least due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
“Health inequalities also remain. Rates of heart and circulatory diseases in the most deprived areas of Scotland are significantly higher than those in the least deprived areas. Dealing with these challenges and years of underinvestment means that new national priorities for addressing heart disease in Scotland are needed.
“That’s why BHF Scotland has been working with the clinical community and heart patients to identify them.
“As we look forward to the Scottish elections at Holyrood in May, we are calling on all political parties to commit to work with us to tackle these issues.”
Ahead of a virtual hustings event tomorrow, the charity has devised three priorities to be put front and centre of a revamped plan, including tackling the root causes such as obesity. high cholesterol and high blood pressure.
It also wants the Scottish Government to ensure each patient has “timely and equitable” access to diagnosis and treatment, as well as improving the use of data to better understand the problem in Scotland.
Dr David Northridge, president of the Scottish Cardiac Society, said: “The lack of consistent data on cardiac care means we don’t have a true picture of the scale of services and access to them across the country, and that is a huge concern and one that we would like to see addressed in any future plan.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here