IN the latest news from the Tory frontlines, the war on woke has descended into farce.
Of course, the Tories’ war on their own vague idea of the “left” was never going to go particularly well.
Now, those dangerous woke lefties aren’t content with threatening the Union, they’re coming for the very streets themselves.
In an “exclusive” which The Telegraph faithfully reported today, we are told that “nearly 200 streets are under threat” across the UK.
Despite the rhetoric, it’s not the streets that are supposedly under threat, but their names.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson draws up five-step plan to 'save the Union' from collapse
The Telegraph highlights the case of Birmingham, where the Labour council there was accused of being “woke” and “virtue signalling” after it named six streets absolutely unpalatable things such as Diversity Grove and Equality Road.
These streets were brand new though, so they never had a name which could have been under threat in the first place.
The article goes on: “Some existing roads are already being renamed by local councils because of a nervousness about Britain's imperial past.”
What these streets were previously called, or where they may be, the Telegraph writer does not tell us.
What we do learn from the piece is that two Tory ministers, Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden and Communities Secretary Robert Jenrick, have backed plans to name new roads after recipients of the Victoria Cross (VC) and George Cross (GC).
The VC, awarded for valour "in the presence of the enemy", is the highest award of the British honours system.
The GC, awarded "for acts of the greatest heroism or for most conspicuous courage in circumstance of extreme danger", is the second most prestigious.
A group of Tory backbenchers, perhaps misleading called the Common Sense Group, is calling for recipients of these awards to be honoured with streets named after them, and statues in their local parks and birthplaces.
John Hayes, the MP from South Holland and The Deepings, the safest Tory seat in the UK, chairs the group. He said they have “launched a campaign to honour every recipient of the VC and GC through the erection of a statue, immortalising them in their place of birth”.
What the Common Sense Group seem to have overlooked is that this would mean men get more than 99% of all these accolades, just as men have received more than 99% of those crosses. For a Government reportedly planning on highlighting how “forward-thinking” the UK is in order to save the Union, this might seem a crucial detail.
The Telegraph tells us: “In total, 1358 individuals have been awarded the Victoria Cross for valour ‘in the presence of the enemy’, whilst 408 men and women have received the George Cross."
Firstly, 1355 “individuals” have received the VC, and they were all men. (The award has been given 1358 times, but three men received it twice).
READ MORE: Boris Johnson's anti-'woke' crusade shows he doesn't understand Yes movement
Secondly, the GC has been awarded to 395 men and 11 women, for a total of 406. The George Cross has also been given to the officers of the Royal Ulster Constabulary and their families, and was famously given to the entire country of Malta (which then put it on its flag).
Furthermore, the VC has been given to some people from the British history of empire that the international community may not appreciate statues of.
In fact, the most ever awarded in a single day went to British soldiers fighting in India during that nation's First War of Independence. Might immortalising those soldiers in statue form not make India, the fifth largest economy in the world, a little rightly annoyed?
So much for global Britain looking forward, bring on insular England looking longingly to its imperial past.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel