ALAN Crocket (Sunday National, January 17) is wrong in his one-sided call for the SNP to stand down on the list in favour of the Greens and others. The first fatal flaw is there is no guarantee that we will win as many as 70 seats out of 73.
This is, I sadly fear, over-optimistic, especially as the Greens have confirmed they will be standing candidates in the constituencies. Has he forgotten that in 2015 David Mundell retained his Westminster seat over the SNP by a smaller majority than the number of votes the Green candidate won?
READ MORE: Henry McLeish is wrong to suggest postponing the Holyrood election
Similarly, Ruth Davidson won Edinburgh Central in 2016 at Holyrood by a smaller majority than the number of votes the Greens won. As they intend to field a large number this year, how many other seats will they cost the SNP? Where is the campaign to get them to stand down on the constituency contents? I also understand that the Independence for Scotland Party are considering standing in some constituency contests, so this is equally applicable to them.
The second flaw is that while I will be delighted to be proved wrong, the LibDems have consistently shown that they dig in when they win seats. Consequently, I would suggest Willie Rennie and Alex Cole-Hamilton will be very difficult to dislodge. They will focus their resources on retaining these two plus Orkney and Shetland, and look to increase their list MSP numbers from one.
READ MORE: Wee Ginger Dug: This is the change Scottish Labour really need to make
Despite Brexit causing problems for the fishing and farming communities, again I would expect the Tories will win more than one. I would, however, be surprised if Labour held onto any constituency seats, but Jackie Baillie in Dumbarton will be hard to dislodge and may scrape home.
An analysis of local government transfers shows that while Patrick Harvie, John Finnie and some others probably do genuinely believe in independence, too many of their supporters have given their transfers to LibDems and Tories in particular. Can they be trusted to deliver on independence, especially as some like Ross Greer have shown an intense dislike for the SNP? Similarly, I have read too much anti-SNP vitriol from these new parties to trust them.
Can I also remind all that ahead of 2016, RISE claimed they could win list seats but even in Highland with Jean Urquhart – who had been elected in 2011 as an SNP MSP – at the head of their list they could not get above about 1.5%, nowhere near the 6% to 7% required to win a list seat. I would be surprised if any of the new parties do any better this time around.
For all of the above reasons, only both votes SNP will guarantee an independence referendum later this year, especially as the publishing of the draft referendum bill with dates is due in March and will be front and centre of the SNP manifesto for May.
Munro Ross
Inverness
KATHLEEN Nutt has written several terrific reports for The National regarding the sudden resignation (or sacking) of Richard Leonard as the Labour party’s Scottish Branch Manager, but I must make a correction to her article (Race to find new leader before election, January 15). It states “Leonard’s successor will be the fifth Scottish Labour leader since the 2014 independence referendum and the tenth since devolution in 1999. The previous leaders are Donald Dewar, Henry McLeish, Jack McConnell, Wendy Alexander, Iain Gray, Johann Lamont, Jim Murphy and Kezia Dugdale.”
READ MORE: Race to find replacement for Richard Leonard before Holyrood election
But Mr Leonard is only the third Scottish Labour Leader since devolution. As correctly highlighted by Johann Lamont during her resignation in October 2014 (as leader of the Labour MSPs) there was no such position as “leader” of the Labour party in Scotland. Between 1999 and December 2014, Labour Party rules clearly stated the leaders of their party in Scotland were Tory Blair, Gordon Brown and Ed Milliband. The first six names in the article were only leaders of Labour MSPs in the Scottish Parliament. It was only with the arrival of Mr Murphy in December 2014 that the position leader of the Labour Party in Scotland was created – which co-incidentally was very convenient as he was a Westminster MP, not a MSP.
Roddy MacNeill
East Kilbride
I SAW Jack McConnell on the TV today referring to SNP voters as “extreme nationalists”. As a supporter of independence and an SNP voter I am somewhat perplexed by this description.
What on earth is an “extreme nationalist”? I have never met one. I have met thousands of ardent supporters of independence and not one of them have ever seemed extreme to me.
READ MORE: Lord McConell under fire for suggesting half of SNP voters are extremists
We don’t talk of extreme Glaswegians or extreme Aberdonians even though I am certain that they are proud of their respective cities.
Perhaps Jack and his ilk should wake up to the fact that it is ordinary Scots who want independence and there is nothing extreme about that.
Harry Key
Largoward
IN a TV interview on Monday I noted that Jack McConnell (full title: Lord McConnell of Glenscorrodale) appears to think his fellow Scots are incapable of thinking of more than two subjects in these anxious times. Given that the noble Lord claimed the highest expenses in that “other place” in 2018/19, independence would mean losing what can only be called “a nice little earner”.
David McCann
Alloa
IT’S claimed that when Nixon went to China, the Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, in response to a question about the impact of the French Revolution, answered by saying it was too early to say. Some reckon that the question and the response was due to a mistranslation. True or not, we can surely all agree that it is indeed to early to say what the impact of the American Civil War is on the culture and the politics of the United States.
Bill Ramsay
via email
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel