A NEW cross-Forth rail tunnel is at the heart of a £22 billion rail revolution proposed by the Scottish Greens.
The Rail for All programme aims to build a modern, zero-carbon network that is affordable and accessible to all. It is hoped the move would create thousands of jobs, while delivering infrastructure that is essential to both tackling the climate emergency and supporting long-term economic prosperity.
The proposed Firth of Forth tunnel would transform journeys between Edinburgh and Fife, up the east coast to Dundee and Aberdeen, and north to Perth and Inverness.
As part of the plans, the party also proposes a new underground station in Leith, the construction of a new overground terminal station near the former St Enoch railway station site on Argyle Street in Glasgow, and the full electrification of the inter-city network by 2030.
The programme would also seek to ensure that, where realistically possible, every town with a population of more than 5000 is connected to the rail network, in addition to the re-opening of the Dunfermline to Alloa route and upgrades to the Highland Main Line, Far North Line, West Highland Line and the Ayr to Stranraer Line.
The party is also calling on the formation of one publicly-owned rail operator by re-integrating ScotRail and Network Rail.
Scottish Greens transport spokesperson, John Finnie, says the programme should be a central part of Scotland’s green recovery from the Covid-19 crisis.
He added: “Scotland’s rail network has suffered from long-term systemic under-investment, with governments of all stripes favouring roads.
“While some improvements have been made in recent years, the network north of the central belt has been largely neglected.
“As someone who, prior to the pandemic restrictions, regularly travelled by rail between the north and the central belt I know all too well just how infuriating the current set-up can be. We can enjoy, and we must demand, the environmental, economic and quality of life benefits of a comprehensively modernised rail network.
In the coming weeks, only subscribers will be able to comment on The National articles. Subscribe now or log in to make sure you stay a part of the conversation.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions. What should we do with our second vote in 2021? What happens if Westminster says no to indyref2?
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversation, register under fake names, and post vile abuse. We’ve had hundreds of emails from you complaining about this, asking us to take steps to ensure that these people aren’t given a platform on our site.
We’re listening to you, and here’s how we plan to make that happen.
We have decided to make the ability to comment only available to our 10,000 paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them.
We’ll be monitoring this change over the first few weeks, and we’re keen to know your thoughts. Email us at letters@thenational.scot if you want to have your say.
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Last Updated:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
Report This Comment