‘SCOTLAND gets what England wants”. I guess that it’s been ever thus for more than 300 years, but the last six have brought this phrase into stark relief.
In 2014 we were told “please vote to stay in the Union, we’ve never needed your leadership more”. Then, on the morning of September 19, 2014, David Cameron stepped out onto Downing Street and unveiled EVEL, a crass reminder of “Scotland gets what England wants”.
That short address relegated the Scottish electorate and their elected representatives at Westminster to the second-class carriage.
In desperation at the polling on independence, Broonzilla got “The Vow” on the front of the Daily Record. If this had been a marriage vow, the Smith Commission would be one of the swiftest annulments in history.
We were warned that leaving the Union meant we would be out of the EU forever, and only a vote for the Union would secure our EU citizenship and all that went with it. But then came 2016, and “Scotland gets what England wants”.
In the few days since the turn of the year, the consequences of Scotland being dragged out of the EU against our clear democratic decision in 2016 are already being felt. Marine produce is at risk of spoiling, no seed tatties are to be sold into the EU and Ewe Lambs bought and paid for by Ulster farmers are stuck in Scotland. Just a sampler menu for the economic pain to come.
Added to this is the loss of freedom of movement, emergency health care and Erasmus, to name but a few.
As the insults, undelivered vows, promises, and impediments to private and commercial life pile up, the English parties in Scotland – Conservative, Labour and LibDem – are unequivocal in stating that Scotland cannot again ask itself the question, “independent, yes or no?”.
I should point out that I was born in England and lived there for the majority of my life, so the refence to “English parties” is not xenophobia, just a statement of fact.
Liam McArthur is an excellent constituency MSP, and I have personally benefited from his diligence in carrying out his elected role, but sadly to my mind, he is on the wrong side of history when it comes to the future of Scotland. As a consequence, at the Holyrood election in May of this year, I will vote for Robert Leslie for the constituency MSP in Orkney and for the Scottish Green Party on the regional list.
“Scotland gets what England wants” ... Is that really good enough for you?
Jon Southerington
Orkney
THE Westminster Government is at it again, boosting support for Scottish independence. First, it is a clawback of powers due to Brexit; now it is attempting to curtail the voice of democracy by reducing the number of Scottish MPs at Westminster.
Scotland is to lose two MPs in the boundary review. Wales is to lose eight, and Ireland is to remain the same ... but wait for it: England is to gain 10!
Really can’t add to this, because the numbers speak for themselves.
Catriona C Clark
Falkirk
HAS a Unionist minister ever been asked why the vast oil reserves of Scotland were made an official secret from Scotland for 30 years ... and what Westminster is still hiding?
Brian Clark
Dunfermline
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here