THE Scottish Government's legal battle with Alex Salmond collapsed following a "watershed" meeting in December 2018, newly-released legal advice shows.
Documents setting out prior contact between those who complained of harassment and the investigating officer were revealed at a late stage in the legal challenge, contradicting earlier claims from the government.
This led to permanent secretary Leslie Evans notifying ministers on January 2, 2019, that the review should be conceded - a decision which was lodged with the Court of Session two days later - though concerns about prior contact between a complainer and the investigating officer were first raised in October 2018.
The decision meant Salmond received a payout of more than £500,000, with the court ruling at a hearing on January 8, 2019, that the investigation had been "tainted by apparent bias".
A redacted version of legal advice dated December 29, 2018, was published on Wednesday.
It follows a dispute between a Scottish Parliament committee investigating the handling of harassment complaints and the government over access to the document.
READ MORE: Holyrood Alex Salmond inquiry has more questions for SNP's Peter Murrell
The document in question, which was sent to Evans, said: "The key point to note is the 'watershed moment' of last Friday [December 21, 2018], at which point the SG's case became [Redacted], unstateable, given what emerged that day about the nature of the contact between the IO [investigating officer] and the prospective complainers prior to their formal complaints having been made."
It went on to say there was nothing to suggest officials were acting "in bad faith", but it was clear the process of producing documents had not been "systematic and comprehensive".
The legal advice stated that conceding the case before Lord Pentland in the Court of Session was likely to be the only "sensible" way forward, adding that their legal team would have to quit the case if the matter was not resolved.
In a covering statement to the document released on Wednesday, the Scottish Government acknowledged that there had been a "collective organisational failure" to gather all the relevant evidence.
It said: "Lessons have been learned from that about the identification and co-ordination of documents during such processes."
Commenting on the publication of the legal advice, Conservative committee member Murdo Fraser said the revelations "make it more important than ever for the government legal advice to be released in full, as has twice been demanded by the Scottish Parliament".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel