ACTION for Independence (AFI), the fledgling party aiming to sweep up list seats in next year’s Scottish Parliament election, has attacked the Electoral Commission (EC) after it was told their registration would not be decided until next year.
Interim leader Dave Thompson said he wondered if “deliberate prevarication” had become an establishment weapon to derail their concept of maximising the Yes votes in the Holyrood poll.
AFI first attempted to register under the name Alliance for Independence, which the regulator knocked back because voters could be “misled”. The party went back to the drawing board and reapplied in October as Action for Independence, but after waiting for 11 weeks, they have been told the earliest a decision will be announced is the end of January.
Thompson, a former SNP MSP, told The National the establishment appeared to be frightened by their strategy: “The latest polls show that the SNP is on track to take a massive majority of the constituency seats, if not all of them, and that the SNP will, probably, get no regional list seats.
“This leaves these 56 seats extremely vulnerable to the unionists and we must make sure they do not sweep up most of them. That is why the smaller indy-supporting parties must come together in a ‘Max the Yes’ alliance, which is the basic concept of AFI. It looks like the UK establishment is scared stiff of that concept.”
George Galloway faced a similar problem when he set up the Alliance for Unity to fight the Holyrood election on a Unionist platform.
The EC rejected that name and he reapplied as All for Unity, which is also under consideration. They refused to directly address Thompson’s claims, but a spokesperson said: “As the registrar of political parties, the commission has a duty to ensure that it takes a fair and reasonable decision in line with the legal registration requirements.
“How long this takes depends on the facts and complexity of each application.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel