TORY minister Jacob Rees-Mogg blasted Unicef yesterday, accusing the global humanitarian agency of acting shamefully, after they moved to help feed poor kids in London.

Earlier this week, the UN body launched a domestic emergency response in the UK for the first time in its more than 70-year history, promising £25,000 to the community project School Food Matters.

The money will be used to supply 18,000 nutritious breakfasts to 25 schools in South London over the two-week Christmas holidays and February half-term.

Anna Kettley, the director of programmes at Unicef UK, said the emergency response was “introduced to tackle the unprecedented impact of the coronavirus crisis and reach the families most in need.”

The initiative was raised in the Commons on Thursday during Business Questions.

Labour MP Zarah Sultana compared the plight of the children in South London to the rising fortunes of Tory donors. 

READ MORE: UK goes ahead with Internal Market Bill without consent from Wales or Scotland

Her question came as analysis by the New York Times revealed that of the roughly $22 billion (£16bn) worth of UK Government contracts made public, about half went to companies either run by “friends and associates of politicians in the Tories or with no prior experience or a history of controversy.”

Sultana said: “For the first time ever Unicef, the UN agency responsible for providing humanitarian aid to children, is having to feed working class kids in the UK. 

“But while children go hungry, a wealthy few enjoy obscene riches from Tory donors handed billions in dodgy Covid contracts, or people like the leader of the house who is reportedly in line to receive an £800,000 dividend payout this year. 

“So, will he give government time to discuss the need to make him and his super rich chums, pay their fair share, so we can end the grotesque inequality that scars our society?”

Rees-Mogg – reportedly worth £150m – was furious. He said: “I think it’s a real scandal that Unicef should be playing politics in this way when it is meant to be looking after people in the poorest, the most deprived countries in the world, where people are starving, where there are famines, and where there are civil wars, and they make cheap political points of this kind, giving I think £25,000 to one council.

“It is a political stunt of the lowest order. What is this government doing about child poverty? We are committed to our manifesto pledge to reduce child poverty. We’ve expanded free school meals for all five to seven year olds benefitting 1.4 million children, we’ve doubled free childcare for eligible working parents, and will establish a one billion [pound] childcare plan giving parents support and freedom to look after children.

READ MORE: SNP MP's brilliant wall art sums up how Scotland feels about the UK Government

“We’re spending £400m of taxpayers money to support children, families and the most vulnerable over winter and through 2021. 

“Since 2010 to 2018/19, there are 100,000 fewer children in absolute poverty in this country. This is a record of success of conservatism and Unicef should be ashamed”.

The SNP’s Tommy Sheppard branded the comments “ridiculous” and “out-of-touch”.

“The scandal is that Unicef have had to step in to feed hungry children in the UK – it is the UK Government that should be ashamed of itself.”

He added: “The Tories spent a decade imposing brutal austerity cuts, which pushed children and families into poverty and hardship even before the pandemic and received criticism from the UN rapporteur on extreme poverty.

“Now they dare to feign anger at the fact that a UN body is stepping in to help. If the situation wasn’t so dire these comments from the Leader of the House would be laughable.

“I welcome Unicef’s intervention.”