THE Home Secretary is facing criticism after touring a notorious Bahrain police station where activists have been tortured.
According to local media Priti Patel praised the state while she was there for its “progress to achieve common interests”.
Human rights groups and those who have been mistreated at the General Directorate of Muharraq Governorate Police condemned the visit.
One democracy activist who was granted asylum in the UK after revealing his torture at the station told The Independent of his frustration seeing Patel photographed there.
READ MORE: No-Deal Brexit: UK threatens to send in gunboats to protect fishing waters
Yusuf al Jamri told the newspaper: “I can't understand why Priti Patel would pay a state visit to the same police station, flanked by the people who have allowed my torturers to walk free.
“How can the Home Office accept that I was tortured at this site, then send the Home Secretary there for a photo opportunity?”
Patel’s trip to the centre took place without being publicised in the UK.
Earlier this year a BBC documentary told the stories of Ebtisam Al-Saegh and Naja Yusuf, two women imprisoned for criticising the ruler of Bahrain. They accused the state’s National Security Agency of torture and sexual assault at the station.
Patel visited Bahrain last weekend to attend an annual conference on security in the Middle East.
Sayed Ahmed Alwadaei, director of the Bahrain Institute for Rights and Democracy, hit out at Patel for the trip.
“By visiting this site, accompanied by the British ambassador, the Home Secretary is emboldening torturers and bolstering the culture of impunity that reigns in the country,” he said.
READ MORE: Brexit: Former Tory chairman slams 'English nationalist' Boris Johnson
Meanwhile Jeed Basyouni of Reprieve said the visit shows “the Government is more interested in PR than in actually protecting human rights in Bahrain”.
A Home Office spokesperson commented: “The Government is committed to supporting Bahrain as it continues to make important security, police and justice reforms, and we will continue to work closely together to promote security and stability in the Gulf region and across the world.
“It is important for the UK to engage with countries around the world on issues such as justice reform and that we work closely with international partners to tackle common threats, including terrorism, to keep our country safe.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel