BORIS Johnson’s position over indyref2 is unsustainable, the SNP’s Kate Forbes has said.
Speaking to BBC Breakfast on the first day of the party’s annual conference, the Scottish Government’s Finance Secretary said the next referendum would be “after the pandemic”.
The minister rejected claims that the SNP Government would “push for an advisory referendum” if the Prime Minister rejected a Section 30 order.
Forbes said: “Well any referendum has to be legally recognised and internationally recognised, so that answers that question.
She added: “Every time the UK Government says no to another independence referendum - which is so clearly against the settled will of the people of Scotland - all they do is boost support for independence.
“So their position, Boris Johnson's position is unsustainable.”
Forbes said she hoped that vote would come in the “first part of the next Parliament.”
She said: “If you look at the last few months we've had 14 polls in a row, which show a sustained and majority support for independence in Scotland.
“Right now, the Government's job, in which I serve, is focused solely on coronavirus, whether that's on the health elements, or the economic crisis. But clearly when it comes to a point after the pandemic - and there will be an after the pandemic, there is hope on the horizon - we need to decide how we recover and what the future is for Scotland.
“And clearly if you look at those polls, the continued growth in support for independence, and the fact that we want to take different decisions and take the country in a different direction, then yes, there should be that choice in front of the people of Scotland, hopefully in the first part of the next parliament.”
The timing of the next vote will be one of the dominant themes of this year's conference.
On Thursday, Nicola Sturgeon said a referendum could be held “in the earlier part” of the next parliamentary session. A number of senior SNP figures have said it could happen as soon as next year.
SNP MP Ian Blackford told the Sunday National that the party needed to plan for the referendum to "take place in 2021.”
Michael Russell told the BBC that the vote could take "before the end of next year.”
And in an interview with the Daily Record, Keith Brown, depute SNP leader, said: “I want to see the referendum held at a point when we can get the best advantage, obviously, for the Yes side, and that will be when we get people out on the streets actually campaigning.”
Asked if it could be held late next year, he said: “If it's safe, then that’s when we should do it.
“I think the Electoral Commission, though, have said that any referendum should have a period of six months campaigning in advance of it, so that gives you a very tight window in May, and that would require everything to go extremely smoothly with the vaccine.”
The First Minister is due to open the conference today. She will tell delegates that Scotland is “now a nation on the cusp of making history.”
“Independence is in clear sight – and with unity of purpose, humility and hard work I have never been so certain that we will deliver it.
“The people of Scotland have the right to choose their future. Let’s now focus all our efforts on making sure we bring about that better country they and future generations deserve.”
She will say support for independence among Scots has now “risen to become the sustained and majority view in public opinion”.
She will add: “While our primary focus must remain on eliminating Covid-19 from our shores, for which we have renewed hope, Scotland must be ready for what comes next. And I know we will be.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel