WHAT is it with Labour politicians who are too embarrassed to mention their own party name or leader on campaign material they give to voters?
A glossy “annual report” sent out to homes in the southside of Glasgow by Anas Sarwar fails to mention either his boss Richard Leonard, Scottish Labour or Labour anywhere on its A4-size four pages.
It does state that Sarwar is an MSP for the Glasgow region, and the leaflet carries a “thank you” rainbow to the NHS, care staff and other key frontline workers for their efforts during the pandemic, as well as to people who volunteered during the crisis.
It also reminds people to get their flu jab.
It raises concerns about the high proportion of Covid deaths in care homes, about the effects of the pause on cancer screening during lockdown and about the damage to businesses and jobs the coronavirus has caused.
But nowhere in the document is the party’s red rose motif and neither in the main text – or even in its small print – does it tell the reader which party Sarwar represents.
One explanation is that the document is paid for by the Scottish Parliament and under the rules the document should not be political.
But neither the Greens or the Tories were so shy about sticking their names on the documents received by southsiders around the same time.
And isn’t it a little bit off, political parties sticking taxpayer-funded material though voters’ doors just five months away from an election?
Of course, one explanation we can think of for the absence of the Labour name is that trailing at 12% in the polls, the party is not exactly popular – least of all in Nicola Sturgeon’s Yes-supporting Glasgow Southside constituency, not so long ago a safe Labour seat.
Sarwar has recently returned to Leonard’s frontbench in the role of constitution spokesman. But thankfully, southsiders were spared his “no” to a second independence vote.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel