LEGISLATION that will bring “overdue reform” to part of Scotland’s pub sector has passed a key vote at Holyrood.
But the Scottish Government has made clear it wants changes to be made to a proposed new law on tied pubs if it is to gain overall approval.
Business minister Jamie Hepburn confirmed the Scottish Government supported the general principles of the Tied Pubs (Scotland) Bill, which has been brought forward by Labour MSP Neil Bibby.
Speaking at Holyrood, Hepburn said: “My conclusion is the Scottish Government should support this bill at stage one. But I must be clear that our continued support is contingent on securing amendments to the bill.”
The Labour MSP’s members’ bill sets out plans for a statutory pubs code and an independent adjudicator in a bid to stop publicans from being locked into restrictive and unfair deals.
Hepburn said the Government wanted to see changes made to lengthen the time over which the measures in the bill will be implemented, saying this was needed for an industry “still dealing with Covid-19”.
Ministers also want to ensure those who have been tenants in tied pubs cannot raise cases long after they have left the sector. There are only about 750 tied pubs in Scotland, which are owned by breweries with the landlords required to buy beer from them.
Bibby told MSPs that changes to help the tied pub sector had been introduced in England and Wales in 2015, with cross-party support there. He vowed he would work with the Scottish Government and other parties at Holyrood to secure “consensus and further improvements” to his bill.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here