THE Home Office has been accused of trying to silence potential whistleblowers at an army barracks being used to house asylum seekers.
Up to 400 people are living at the military site in Folkestone, Kent, where there have been reports of questionable conditions.
Ambulance staff have also been called out following reports of self-harm at the Napier Barracks.
Now it has emerged that volunteers going into the site to offer help and support to those living within are being made to sign a confidentiality agreement.
The document – seen by the PA news agency – is underpinned by the Official Secrets Act. Under the agreement, volunteers must treat as confidential any information about "service users", namely the asylum-seekers living at the site.
READ MORE: Home Office broke equalities law with hostile environment policies
Bella Sankey, director of Detention Action, accused the Home Office of "trying to gag" volunteers.
She said: "The Official Secrets Act is intended to protect state secrets and national security, not the Government's treatment of people who have arrived in the UK seeking sanctuary.
"Locking people up at an old army barracks is inappropriate enough, without trying to gag those who volunteer to provide basic essentials to those in need.
"We've heard reports of self-harm, suicide attempts, Covid outbreaks and cramped and unsanitary dorms, meaning more – not less – public information is needed about this seemingly reckless experiment."
Those living at the controversial site are free to leave if they want to but are obliged to be back by 10pm.
The Home Office has sought to defend the agreements issued to volunteers.
Their spokesperson said: "We have worked closely with our accommodation provider Clearsprings Ready Homes and stakeholders to ensure the Napier site is safe and secure.
"This includes an agreement with staff to provide asylum seekers with privacy and confidentiality, as would be expected."
The Official Secrets Act is designed to protect state secrets and those convicted of breaching it can be sent to prison.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here