A UK-WIDE public inquiry examining the scandal of contaminated blood products will hear evidence from Scottish medics next month.
Professor Christopher Ludlam, a former director of the Edinburgh haemophilia centre, will appear at a series of hearings scheduled over four days from Tuesday, December 1.
Three other clinicians who treated haemophilia patients in Glasgow at the time of the scandal will give evidence the following week – Dr Anna Pettigrew, Professor Ian Hann and Professor Gordon Lowe.
The infected blood inquiry, which began in September 2018, is examining how as many as 30,000 people across the UK – including around 3000 in Scotland – were infected with HIV and hepatitis through contaminated blood products imported from the US in the 1970s and 1980s. Thousands have since died.
Chaired by Sir Brian Langstaff, it is also looking at the impact on their families, how authorities including government responded and whether there was a cover-up.
READ MORE: Coronavirus: The areas in Scotland with most Covid cases
It is being held live in Fleetbank House, central London, where it is being streamed online due to Covid.
The Scottish medics, who will attend remotely via video-link, are expected to be quizzed on issues including knowledge of risk, patient consent, testing and the response at the time to new and emerging viruses.
Campaigners have battled for decades to find answers over what has been described as the biggest treatment disaster in the history of the NHS. Many of those infected were haemophiliacs, while others had received blood transfusions.
The six-year Penrose Inquiry held in Scotland into the disaster, which concluded in 2015 and cost £12 million, was labelled a “whitewash” by victims.
Last year survivors in Scotland gave evidence to the UK inquiry about a “coalition of secrecy” surrounding the blood scandal.
One man said medics had known he had hepatitis C nine years before he was told.
Bill Wright, chair of support group Haemophilia Scotland, said he hoped the UK inquiry would allow a fuller understanding of what went wrong.
He said: “The evidence from medical witnesses so far from south of the Border is proving very upsetting for some survivors who are following it.
“So Scottish survivors are steeling themselves in anticipation of what is to come.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here