THANK you for the letter from Ann Leitch (November 16). She is absolutely right, a great many older people who now support us in our struggle for independence have due regard and respect for the Queen and the royal family.
I do not know much about our monarchy, but I cannot for the life of me understand why people would want their country to be represented by a president. Looking around the world, one can see presidents who are tyrants of different sorts. Some of them have reached their position by wading through blood, others have deliberately robbed their country’s economy through corruption, others hang on to power at all costs by waging war on their own people and with various types of oppression.
READ MORE: Letters, November 16
Even the best of presidents have usually arrived at their position through “o’er-vaulting ambition”. The two candidates in the recent presidential election in the USA are hardly men who can edify us; the USA is supposedly the most democratic country in the world, yet to enter into politics there one has to have so much money, one has to have spent an entire lifetime thinking about this and have learned little else.
What is wrong with having a constitutional monarch? Norway has one, Sweden has one and Denmark has one. They do not rob the national coffers and they are not allowed to wage wars.
Since time began, no-one can be held responsible for the accident of their birth, or guilty for being born. The crucial element in our present Queen’s ancestry is Mary Queen of Scots. With great courage and initiative, she preserved the life of her unborn child James VI. In the end, she was betrayed by Scotland and murdered by England, not to put too fine a point on it.
450 years later, through no fault of hers, our present Queen occupies the throne. Her chief enemies seem to be the yah-boo press and media. Protocol and good manners prevent her from entering into controversy with them. In this she is more sinned against than sinning.
Lesley J Findlay
Fort Augustus
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel