Anas Sarwar - a prominent member of the anti-independence Better Together alliance - is back on the Scottish Labour front bench as the party's constitution spokesman.
The move suggests Richard Leonard is in no mood to soften Labour's opposition to an independence referendum despite many in the party suggesting he should.
The Glasgow MSP takes over the key constitution brief from Alex Rowley, who will now share Leonard's economy remit.
Sarwar was defeated for the Scottish Labour leadership by Leonard in 2017 and was sacked as health spokesman the following year.
His return has been announced in a minor party reshuffle, in which Rhoda Grant has been named as the replacement for James Kelly, who quit as justice spokesman in September amid criticism of the party's leadership.
Elaine Smith will become the party's poverty spokeswoman.
Sarwar said: "I'm pleased to be asked by Richard to rejoin the Scottish Labour shadow cabinet.
"In the midst of a pandemic, where people's lives and livelihoods are at risk, we need to focus on bringing our country together again to reflect the priorities of the people of Scotland.
"Covid-19 has changed Scotland and the world so the idea that we can return to the old arguments and old rivalries is just not credible."
Leonard said: "I am delighted to welcome back my friend Anas Sarwar to the shadow cabinet.
"In his new role as shadow constitution minister, Anas will be a part of a forward-looking and united Scottish Labour frontbench at Holyrood, which will hold Nicola Sturgeon's Government to account over its failures in the handling of the Covid pandemic and promote Scottish Labour's transformative programme ahead of next year's election."
Sarwar played a prominent role in the Better Together campaign to oppose independence in the 2014 vote when he was Scottish Labour deputy leader.
Leonard has been urged by some Labour members to soften his stance against a second independence referendum amid rising support for independence.
A series of polls has suggested that most Scots now back independence with one survey putting support at a record high of 58%.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel