IN a rage at losing the election, President Donald Trump has been lashing out at states and individuals he accuses of “stealing” a victory from him.
Yesterday, after days of screaming foul play, Trump came up against a fellow Republican who gave the president a very polite tongue-lashing that was being seen nationwide as a deserved rebuke.
Though the Trump campaign pulled out of a lawsuit in Nevada, where the state has allowed the Republican Party more access to the remaining counts in Clark County, the Trump managers also filed suits in Michigan, Georgia and Pennsylvania, all alleging one kind or other of voter fraud.
Trump won one concession in Georgia where there will now be a recount by hand of all ballots, a process that could take weeks. The state, however, has defended its procedures as robust and no substantial evidence of electoral fraud has been produced there, or anywhere, by the Trump campaign or Trump aides.
President-elect Joe Biden has refused to enter into a shouting match with Trump over the ballot issues, though he did say it was an “embarrassment”. But a senior Republican in Pennsylvania was more than a little ticked off with his party’s leader.
Trump tweeted: “A guy named Al Schmidt, a Philadelphia commissioner and so-called Republican (RINO), is being used big time by the fake news media to explain how honest things were with respect to the election in Philadelphia. He refuses to look at a mountain of corruption and dishonesty. We win!”
Unfortunately for Trump, Schmidt is the Republican that the Republicans credit with cleaning up the ballot process in the state.
Schmidt said on CNN yesterday: “I have seen the most fantastical things on social media, that have no basis in reality at all.”
In a clear dig at Trump, Schmidt said: “We just had the most transparent and secure election in the history of Philadelphia. And the people here work night and day to do our job, and count those votes.
“One thing I can’t comprehend is how hungry people are to consume lies, and to consume information that is not true.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel