PROSECUTORS refused to hand over any information they hold about the Scottish Government's investigation of Alex Salmond.
Holyrood's inquiry into the botched investigation into claims of sexual harassment against the former First Minister asked the Lord Advocate's office to release any "relevant" material to it.
In a letter to the inquiry, the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) argued releasing any information without a "legal basis" could discourage witnesses from coming forward in the future and "undermine public confidence both in the police and in COPFS".
But it said the committee could seek the power to release the information through a standing order.
The Committee on the Scottish Government Handling of Harassment Complaints was set up after Salmond won a legal challenge and £512,250 payout at the Court of Session over the way claims against him were dealt with.
Last week, the committee's convener Linda Fabiani wrote to Lord Advocate James Wolffe QC asking for "relevant information and evidence" that the Crown may have that could help with its investigation, such as communications between officials relating to the conduct of the judicial review and the Scottish Government's decision to concede.
Responding on behalf of COPFS, High Court procurator fiscal Kenny Donnelly said there is no formal or legal requirement for the information to be provided.
Donnelly also said there is no legal basis allowing Salmond and his lawyers to release confidential evidence used during his criminal trial or to provide it to the committee.
While Donnelly found the committee's request for information does not carry legal force, he suggested it could seek the power to release the information through a standing order and then make a formal request under Section 23 of the Scotland Act 1998.
He explained that COPFS's counsel, on behalf of the Lord Advocate, would then need to consider whether producing the required documents would be in the public interest.
Donnelly wrote: "If COPFS were to provide such information for other purposes then there is a significant risk that this would undermine public confidence both in the police and in COPFS and that members of the public would be discouraged from providing such information which is necessary for the investigation and prosecution of crime.
"At present, you have identified no legal basis that would allow COPFS to disclose any material which it holds to the committee."
The letter also quotes the Scottish Information Commissioner Daren Fitzhenry, who said witnesses who gave statements to police would not expect the information to be released outside of that investigation.
In her request for information, Fabiani stressed the committee is not considering "the 'merits' of the allegations or the conduct of the trial".
Instead, she told the prosecutor: "The committee is seeking material that the Crown may hold which falls within the committee's remit - specifically any information, for example, communications between officials, related to the conduct of the judicial review and the Scottish Government's decision to concede - as well as information concerning the handling of the harassment complaints considered under the Scottish Government procedure as opposed to the merits of any such complaints."
The approach comes after Scottish Government director for communications for ministerial support and facilities Barbara Allison told MSPs she obtained a copy of text messages between herself and Permanent Secretary Leslie Evans from the Crown Office as she no longer had them.
She said the exchange had "been retrieved from her mobile phone in the context of the proceedings in HMA v Alexander Salmond".
After Salmond's successful legal challenge, Evans sent a text message to Allison saying the "battle maybe lost but not the war".
Fabiani has now told the Lord Advocate the committee wants to obtain "relevant information and evidence" that the Crown may have that could help with its investigation.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel