JUST four people have written to the Scottish Government to complain about indyref2 – and two of them praised Nicola Sturgeon.
Details of the correspondence were released in a Freedom of Information request yesterday, it’s not known who submitted the request but it’s almost certainly Unionists.
In fairness, it might not be.
But we really hope it is, because if it is then it’s a plot that's backfired horribly.
The FOI request called for “copies of emails sent to First Minister Nicola Sturgeon from members of the public regarding their concern/anger/unhappiness and/or similar" at:
- Firstly, the "announcement of the Referendums Bill in her Programme for Government 2020-21".
- And then "secondly, the Scottish Government’s decision to actively pursue another independence referendum but the email does not necessarily need to reference the Referendums Bill”.
The Government revealed that nobody – not one person – had complained about the announcement of the Referendums Bill in the Programme for Government.
However, four people had emailed Sturgeon to complain about indy. I mean, that's fewer anti-indy letters than the Herald gets in a day.
In the first email, the writer said they had “been impressed by the clear, precise way you have dealt with the pandemic so far”, before adding: “Why is your government spending money on preparing for another referendum when Scotland is in a recession and in the middle a health emergency? All money should be spent on these crises. This is not the time and I think will lead to a fall in your Government’s popularity.”
The second letter writer wasn’t so keen on Sturgeon in general. It “very much disappoints me to hear you on the bandwagon for Independence again,” they wrote.
The third started off: “I'm a concerned individual who originally voted against you in the first scottish referendum however since Boris came into power and mishandled the pandemic I have become a supporter of your party.”
However, the writer warned, “this might be short lived," saying he'd "like to understand why the SNP is aiming and pushing out future Scottish Independence during a global pandemic when we also may face a recession".
"Would it be better in the nation's interest to maintain the union until we are stable if the first few years may not go exactly as planned?”
That reads like a soft no to us.
The fourth was far more blunt. “First minister. How about getting on with the day job and throw the indy ref in the bin. You know we don't need this now or in the future.
"The people of Scotland want you to concentrate on the covid virus pandemic and not on your own agenda of destroying the country with another referendum!
"Personally I don't know anyone who wants another referendum or independence.”
We'll put them in the maybe pile.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel