SCOTS support holding a second referendum by a margin of almost two to one if pro-independence MSPs win a majority at Holyrood, a new poll has suggested.
When “don’t knows” were removed, the Survation survey found 54% agreed there would be a mandate for a second referendum while 30% disagreed.
The research was part of a previous poll that found support for independence at 54%.
Pollsters asked if more than half the MSPs came from independence-supporting parties – such as the SNP and the Scottish Greens – if this would constitute a mandate for another referendum to be held.
Almost half of people (49%) were of the view that this would be the case – with 27% saying they agreed strongly with this and another 22% saying they would “somewhat agree”.
READ MORE: New indyref2 Plan B backed by Joanna Cherry submitted to SNP conference
Just over a quarter (27%) were opposed, even if Holyrood returns a majority of pro-independence MSPs in the May election – with 17% of those questioned strongly disagreeing with a second referendum in such circumstances, while 10% said they disagreed “somewhat”.
The result of the research comes as Scottish Secretary Alister Jack dismissed the prospect of having a second vote on whether the country should stay in the UK.
With SNP leaders having described the 2014 ballot, in the run up to the vote, as a “once in a generation” event, the Scottish Tory MP suggested a generation could be “25 or 40 years”.
Jack insisted: “I don’t think we should keep having referendums until they get their own way, it should respect the outcome of the one we had.”
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon responded to that by tweeting that “politicians who rage against democracy don’t prevail”.
Campaign consultant James Mackenzie, who commissioned the Survation research, said: “Anyone who wants Scotland to get a second chance to vote on independence should vote for SNP or Green MSPs next May.
“By almost two to one, the Scottish public don’t buy the cynical chat from some quarters that only an SNP-only majority would count as a mandate.
“Nor do they accept Boris Johnson’s anti-democratic line that we shouldn’t be allowed to vote again.”
Mackenzie, a former head of media for Scottish Green MSPs, continued: “It’s unclear how anyone will make the case for the Union next time with a straight face, which is presumably why the Prime Minister would rather we don’t get the chance.
“Whether it’s about responding to the pandemic or climate change, the semi-feudal Westminster system has repeatedly proved utterly unfit for the 21st century.”
Commenting, SNP Depute Leader Keith Brown said: “A clear and overwhelming number of voters believe that Scotland should have the right to decide its own future.
READ MORE: Scottish independence assembly attracts hundreds globally, and is still growing
“Westminster’s attempts to block the will of the people have been in vain, and the pressure on Boris Johnson to respect the democratic rights of voters in Scotland is now immense.
“We didn’t vote for this Tory Brexit, and we certainly didn’t vote for Boris Johnson. They have no right to decide Scotland’s future for us.”
The First Minister put off plans for a second independence referendum this year amid the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic.
However, she has said she will publish a draft referendum bill before the end of the current Holyrood term, which finishes in March next year, and ahead of the Scottish Parliamentary elections in May. A series of polls have given majority support for independence.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel