JOANNA Cherry has called for the creation of a new SNP group to work on “a copper-bottomed strategy” for securing indyref2.
The MP’s comments come after a leaked memo prepared by a Tory consultancy group suggested the UK Government were “war-gaming” ways to stop independence.
Writing in today’s The National, Cherry says the SNP should be doing some gaming of its own.
This, she says, would involve this new group devising a plan “to be employed to deal with the inevitable Tory dirty tricks when yet another mandate is secured”.
The MP suggests this new body should be made up of “a wide cross-section of the party, from centre to left and not just comprise of the usual suspects.”
READ MORE: Joanna Cherry: Salmondites? Sturgeonites? It doesn't matter when we work as one
She says “some of the brains in the SNP who are not employed full-time dealing with the Covid crisis would like nothing more than to contribute to the development of strategy but feel left out in the cold without an obvious avenue for such contributions to be meaningful”.
She says it’s wrong for the party “to predicate our entire strategy on the assumption that [The Tories] will do the right thing when their past behaviour suggests quite the opposite.”
Cherry says there needs to be “a strategy to fall back on when sleekit tactics of delay and avoidance are employed,” and a Section 30 order is not forthcoming.
She also says the party needs to challenge the narrative “which seeks to label us all as either Salmondites or Sturgeonites. “
“Most of us actually have minds of our own and what we all have in common is the desire for independence,” she writes.
In her column, Cherry also says she thinks it likely that delegates at the next SNP conference will “seize the chance to improve the governance of our party by electing an NEC which reflects the views of the membership and their desire for scrutiny and transparency”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel