FOR any viewer who was paying attention to Question Time, it was pretty obvious Kate Forbes got the better of Douglas Ross.
But it seems the Scottish Tories are banking on no-one paying close attention.
They’ve released a video of the party chief’s exchange with the Scottish Finance Secretary – with all of her comments redacted.
The somewhat one-sided exchange suggests that Ross had Forbes on the ropes over government support for businesses during the pandemic.
.@Douglas4Moray:
— Scottish Conservatives (@ScotTories) October 16, 2020
“I think it is absolutely appalling that businesses have once again been the final thought for this Government." #bbcqt pic.twitter.com/d5lFhNVEUx
Eagle-eyed onlookers couldn’t help but notice that the actual exchange was not nearly as flattering for the Scottish Tory leader.
He had suggested Holyrood ministers are withholding some of the £700 million in funding passed on by Westminster.
That forced Forbes to point out: “You do appreciate that’s for health? It’s not just for business support.”
Ross insisted that the cash was for the £3000 grants the UK Government is giving to businesses in England – demanding: “Give them that £700m you’ve got from the Chancellor.”
READ MORE: Douglas Ross humiliated as Kate Forbes corrects his funding claim on Question Time
In a clip deemed expendable by the Scottish Tories, the Finance Secretary explained: “The two points I would make is one – small grants of £1500 is no replacement for the furlough scheme. That’s point number one. Point number two is that £700m, worth asking the Chancellor, that does not just cover business support.
“That’s for health, that’s for transport, and a whole host of other things. Just for clarity. The third point is the business support we’ve put in place is more generous than the UK Government support.”
She added: “In the rest of the UK if you are obliged by law to close you’ll get a grant. But all the businesses in the supply chain won’t get funding and other businesses that are not directly impacted won’t get funding.
“In Scotland we’ve required funding for the businesses required by law but also the businesses in the supply chain – businesses that might see reduced trading but aren’t required to close by law.
“And I think that’s the breadth of support that we need to see. But let’s not kid ourselves – £1500 of grant, as important as it is, is no replacement for the furlough scheme.”
🤷♀️ Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross needs to learn how devolution works.
— The SNP (@theSNP) October 16, 2020
👇 Watch Finance Secretary @KateForbesMSP tear his argument to shreds. pic.twitter.com/8nNSgL6vnO
Forbes’s party didn’t resort to dirty tricks, opting to show the full exchange.
It’s yet another own goal from the Scottish Tories.
If you’re having to cut out the opposition’s comments completely, it’s probably a sign you’re losing the argument.
In the coming weeks, only subscribers will be able to comment on The National articles. Subscribe now or log in to make sure you stay a part of the conversation.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions. What should we do with our second vote in 2021? What happens if Westminster says no to indyref2?
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversation, register under fake names, and post vile abuse. We’ve had hundreds of emails from you complaining about this, asking us to take steps to ensure that these people aren’t given a platform on our site.
We’re listening to you, and here’s how we plan to make that happen.
We have decided to make the ability to comment only available to our 10,000 paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them.
We’ll be monitoring this change over the first few weeks, and we’re keen to know your thoughts. Email us at letters@thenational.scot if you want to have your say.
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Last Updated:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
Report This Comment