THE UK Government is facing legal action after it failed to account for £3 billion of spending on private contracts since the start of lockdown.
Three cross-party MPs and the Good Law Project, a non-profit-making organisation, have launched proceedings against Downing Street over its failure to disclose details of its spending on contracts related to the pandemic.
Green MP Caroline Lucas, Labour's Debbie Abrahams and Liberal Democrat MP Layla Moran have filed a judicial review against the Tory Government for breaching the law and its own guidance and argue that there are mounting concerns over the Government's coronavirus procurement processes.
READ MORE: Firm run by Tory councillor given £156 million contract to import PPE
They say that, despite the Department of Health and Social Care disclosing in September that at least £11bn worth of contracts have been awarded by the department since April, related predominantly to coronavirus, new analysis by Tussell shows that more than £3bn worth of these contracts have not been made public.
The Department of Health and Social Care has said due diligence was carried out on all Government contracts which have been awarded.
The UK Government has 21 days to respond to the judicial review proceedings.
Jolyon Maugham QC, director of Good Law Project said: "What we know about the Government's procurement practices during this pandemic gives real cause for concern. Huge sums of public money have been awarded to companies with no discernible expertise.
"Sometimes the main qualification seems to be a political connection with key Government figures.
"And I have seen evidence that Government is sometimes paying more to buy the same product from those with political connections.
"We don't know what else there is to discover because the Government is deliberately keeping the public in the dark.
"We are left with no option but to push for transparency through the courts."
READ MORE: Firm run by Michelle Mone's ex-associate handed £112m NHS contract
Lucas added: "When billions of pounds of public money is handed out to private companies, some of them with political connections but no experience in delivering medical supplies, ministers should be explaining why those companies were awarded the contracts.
"It's completely unacceptable that, as an MP, I'm prevented from being able to scrutinise those decisions."
The legal challenge is being crowdfunded with the support of 38 Degrees and Good Law Project and the three MPs have instructed Deighton Pierce Glynn and Jason Coppel QC and Christopher Knight of 11KBW to act in the judicial review proceedings.
Campaigns director of 38 Degrees, Ellie Gellard said: "The public needs to know where taxpayers' money has been spent in our ongoing battle against coronavirus so that we can be sure those who have been paid, deliver what they promised.
"That's why thousands of members of the public have chipped in to help get the answers we deserve, transparency is needed to restore public trust in the Government's approach."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel