JOHN Swinney has cancelled next year's National 5 exams, telling Holyrood a full diet would be "too big a risk to take".
Instead grades will be awarded based on coursework and teacher judgement.
Highers and Advanced Higher exams will continue, though they'll start later in the year to allow "some additional learning time... to make up for some of that lost at the end of 2019-20."
The Education Secretary promised that a clear contingency plan would be put in place “in case it proves impossible for Higher and Advanced Higher exams to go ahead due to public health advice.”
Ultimately, the Scottish Government believe the decision to axe the National 5s will reduce the volume of exams by half, lowering public health risks.
Swinney's decision came after a "rapid review" by Stirling University's Professor Mark Priestley recommended suspending the exam diet and awarding qualifications "on the basis of centre estimation based upon validated assessments".
The government said they were conscious of the "disruption already caused and the level of disruption likely to be faced by some or all pupils and students this academic year".
The move came as Nicola Sturgeon imposed new restrictions across Scotland, as coronavirus cases continued to climb.
Schools are to remain open, but Swinney said pupils would likely still be impacted.
The Deputy First Minister told Holyrood said:“My priority is to ensure that learning is assessed fairly and consistently so that pupils can be confident in the results they gain.
“Given the real risk of further disruption to education, it would not be sensible or fair to plan for a full exam diet in 2021. Coronavirus has not gone away. If anything, it is making a comeback.
“In a normal exam year, National 5s constitute more than half of all exams taken. From a public health point of view, not running these exams significantly reduces risk. National 5 pupils will receive awards based on their coursework and the judgement of their teachers, with robust quality assurance. We have learned lessons from this year’s initial SQA gradings - there will be no algorithm for moderating grades in 2021.
“By replacing National 5 exams, we can hold an exam diet for Highers and Advanced Highers if public health guidance allows – these are the qualifications most pupils leave schools with that determine paths into work, college, or university.
“None of us can predict the coming weeks and months, so clear contingency plans are being developed should, for public health reasons, the exams have to be replaced. In those circumstances and only if necessary, we will award Higher and Advanced Higher grades based on teacher judgement, supported by SQA quality assurance, taking account of assessment evidence."
The Greens said Swinney should have gone further and cancelled all exams.
Education Spokesperson Ross Greer said: “Cancelling and replacing National 5 exams was the only responsible choice, so I cannot for the life of me work out why the Education Secretary hasn't done the same with Highers.
"His comment that this will ‘free up capacity’ doesn’t make sense, given that Nat 5 and Higher exams don’t normally take place at the same time, and it was notable that he avoided my question on this point rather than answer it.
“Higher pupils are still being subjected to an unacceptable level of risk, preparing all year for exams which may be cancelled when the government could have adopted the same coursework-based alternative system chosen for Nat 5s."
However, the Scottish Tories said Swinney had "thrown in the towel."
Their education spokesman, Jamie Green said: “Serious questions remain for John Swinney on how National 5 grades will be awarded and what contingency plans will be in place for Highers and Advanced Highers if exams cannot proceed.
“Confidence in him is already rock bottom, and today’s announcement raises more questions than answers."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel