DONALD Trump says he is feeling “much better”, though his medical team have warned he is is "not yet out of the woods".
Amid conflicting reports over his condition after being admitted to hospital with Covid-19, the president's doctors said they are "cautiously optimistic".
Trump was taken to the Walter Reed Medical Centre on Friday, with a White House spokeswoman saying he was expected to stay for "a few days".
In a video from his hospital quarters posted on Saturday, Trump says he is feeling better and hopes to "be back soon".
He defended his decision to continue campaigning and holding large events in the midst of a pandemic.
"I had no choice," said the president, who refused to abide by basic public health recommendations, including mask-wearing.
"I had to be out front ... I can't be locked up in a room upstairs and totally safe. As a leader, you have to confront problems."
The bright assessment of Trump's condition from White House doctors was in contrast to that given by his chief of staff Mark Meadows. In a briefing to reporters soon after Conley gave his assessment, Meadows said the president went through a "very concerning" period on Friday and faced a "critical" next two days in his fight against Covid-19.
Trump is 74 years old and clinically obese, putting him at higher risk of serious complications from a virus that has infected more than seven million people and killed more than 200,000 in the US.
The administration has consistently been less than transparent about the president's health as the virus spread inside the White House.
Aides declined to share basic health information about the president, including a full accounting of his symptoms, what tests he has undertaken and the results.
Also, the first word that a close aide to Trump had been infected came from the media, not the White House.
In a memo released late on Friday, Conley did report Trump had been treated at the hospital with remdesivir, an antiviral medication, after taking another experimental drug at the White House.
Meanwhile, the White House has been working to trace a flurry of new infections of close Trump aides and allies.
Attention is focused in particular on last Saturday's White House event introducing Mr Trump's Supreme Court nominee.
That day, Trump gathered more than 150 people in the Rose Garden, where they mingled, hugged and shook hands.
There were also several indoor receptions, where Trump's Supreme Court pick, Judge Amy Coney Barrett, her family, senators and others spent time in the close quarters of the White House, photographs show.
Among those who attended and have now tested positive include former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, White House counsellor Kellyanne Conway, the president of the University of Notre Dame, and at least two Republican senators, Mike Lee and Thom Tillis.
The president's campaign manager, Bill Stepien, and the head of the Republican National Committee, Ronna McDaniel, have also tested positive, though they were not at the event.
Despite its failure to protect the president and senior staff from infection, the White House has given no indication that it intends to make any major protocol changes, such as mandating that everyone wears a mask.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel