DOUGLAS Ross has moved to distance himself from a Home Office plan to base asylum seeker detention facilities on Scottish islands.
The Scottish Tory leader said the proposals were not “practical, considered or reasonable”.
On Friday, the Herald reported that Priti Patel’s department had confirmed that Orkney, Shetland and the Western Isles were being considered as possible locations to build processing centres for vulnerable refugees.
A Whitehall source told the paper: “It would be remiss of the Home Office not to look at all options on how best to resolve this problem.
“All these options are on the table, including using Scottish islands. Everything is being considered...and nothing has been ruled out.”
Responding to the report Ross said: “I would never support an asylum processing centre on a Scottish island or in the North Sea.
“While I understand and share the need to take strong action to stop illegal migration and deter asylum seekers from making a dangerous journey, this is not a practical, considered or reasonable approach.
“Immigration plans must balance the need to control our borders with the safety of people who are in need of asylum.”
Other suggestions reportedly discussed by the government, included the construction of an asylum processing centre on Ascension Island, a British overseas territory more than 4,000 miles from the UK.
The Home Office also looked at using water cannons to create waves to push back boats in the Channel, and using chains to tangle their propellers.
However, the water cannon plan was rejected amid concern that staff could have faced murder charges if migrants drowned.
In a brainstorming session, Home Office even considered shipping migrants to repurposed oil platforms for processing. That plan was dismissed on safety grounds.
Nicola Sturgeon has made clear she would oppose any UK government bid to build a detention centre on a Scottish island.
"They can rest assured that any proposal to treat human beings like cattle in a holding pen will be met with the strongest possible opposition from me," the First Minister tweeted.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel