PLANS for remote control towers to be used at airports serving island communities are “unsafe and untested”, MSPs have been told.
The Scottish Parliament’s Public Petitions Committee heard from campaigners urging Highlands and Islands Airports Ltd (HIAL) to halt its plans to centralise air traffic control services.
The company, which is 100% owned by Scottish ministers and runs 11 airports, says the plan will solve recruitment issues and make it sustainable in the long term.
But opponents, which include community councils based near some of the airports, say it could cause delays to “lifeline” flights.
The committee yesterday heard from two witnesses supporting a petition against the plans, who said there should be a greater focus on recruiting from local communities.
One of the witnesses, Peter Henderson, who worked at Kirkwall Airport in Orkney for 18 years as an air traffic assistant, said there is a risk emergency “blue light” medical flights could be disrupted.
READ MORE: RAF dispatches plane to survey Channel after migrant crossings
He said: “I cannot with a clear conscience accept that this is safe and I don’t want people in my community made more ill or dying because of remote links which are highly unstable.”
He said airport control towers have visibility of around 15 miles on an average day, whereas the remotely monitored cameras would have a view of only three miles.
Henderson said: “We’re reliant on being able to see things.
“Why send all of that 100 miles through cables all through the Highlands for a compressed view?
“It’s just wrong. And it’s unsafe and it’s untested and we’re being experimented on.”
He added: “The technology around remote control towers is still “in its infancy.”
John Doig, who presented the petition on behalf of Benbecula Community Council, said there has been a lack of consultation with communities the move would affect.
He said the changes would mean bad weather could cause “significant delays to scheduled or mail flights to stop them from arriving and departing at the same time”.
Committee convener Johann Lamont said the evidence was “extremely useful” and further views will be sought from Holyrood.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel