SCOTLAND’S Communities Secretary Aileen Campbell has launched a fierce attack on the Home Office’s decision to restart the repatriation of failed asylum seekers during the coronavirus pandemic.
The Home Office had continued to provide accommodation for those granted asylum and failed asylum seekers while lockdown restrictions were in place, but that decision is being reversed.
In a letter to Chris Philp, UK Minister for Immigration Compliance and the Courts, Campbell wrote: “ I am utterly astonished and dismayed to learn that you are pressing ahead with restarting moves on processes for people with negative asylum decisions in the midst of a global pandemic that continues to threaten public health.
“This is particularly concerning following the recent significant increases in Covid-19 cases and the additional restrictions put in place this week by both of our governments.
READ MORE: 'Glasgow Girl' Roza Salih aims to be first refugee elected to Holyrood
“I believe that the pause the Home Office put in place on ending support to people at the end of the asylum process at the outset of the pandemic was the right thing to do to keep people safe and protected.
“It is extremely disappointing that this pause is now ending for those who are most vulnerable to destitution and homelessness at such a dangerous moment in our progress through the pandemic.
The Scottish Government, local authorities and the third sector have all put immense effort and substantial resources into ensuring that everyone in our communities is safe and supported, with a roof over their heads, including those with no recourse to public funds. Now is very definitely not the time to be risking the delicate progress we have made.”
Glasgow has been by far the largest recipient of asylum seekers in the new scheme, and Campbell said: “As you may be aware, Glasgow was already subject to additional restrictions prior to this week, due to the public health concerns arising from increasing numbers of cases of Covid-19 in the city.
“With winter approaching and falling temperatures that may provide a more conducive environment for the spread of Covid-19, your decision is increasing the risk of having significant numbers of people on the streets with no support.
READ MORE: We just want our children: Anguish of New Scots families split by war and Home Office
“We know that people from minority ethnic communities have been particularly adversely affected by Covid-19. This makes us all the more concerned about the impact of ending support to people with negative asylum decisions.
“You will be aware that there were significant concerns across communities in Glasgow when Serco moved to evict people from their asylum accommodation two years ago. These concerns would be magnified in the event that people were threatened with eviction during a pandemic.
“I recognise there will come a time when move on processes will have to restart for people with negative asylum decisions. However, that must be done in a supportive way that does not leave people in limbo, and it must not take place until we have reached a point in our recovery where we can be confident that Covid-19 is no longer a significant risk to public health.”
A Home Office spokesperson said: “The phased cessation of support has now begun in order to reduce the demand on the asylum system. We have been clear from the outset that this was a temporary measure which would be brought to an end as soon as it was safe to do so.
“Those who have received a negative asylum decision, which means they have no right to remain the UK, are given a 21-day grace period. During this time they are expected to make steps to return to their country of origin while still remaining in accommodation and receiving support.
“Assistance is available for those who leave voluntarily, but for those who do not, enforcement action may be taken to facilitate removal.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel