CONTINGENCY planning is under way in case the pandemic prevents next year’s Holyrood election from going ahead as normal.
Talk of delaying the election has been denied in recent months but as the May poll grows closer, the Scottish Government, the Electoral Commission, Scottish Parliament officials and political parties are assessing options.
It is not yet known what alternatives are being considered, although a report in the Sunday Mail suggests that moving polling day to October and a 100% postal vote were both under consideration.
READ MORE: SNP activist to sue party over rules on MPs standing for Holyrood elections
Speaking on the BBC's Politics Scotland programme, Deputy First Minister John Swinney said the preference of the Scottish Government would be to go ahead as planned in May.
He said: "There's a bit of uncertainty about the period that lies ahead, the Government's plan and Parliament's plan is that the election should take place as scheduled on the first Thursday in May.
"There are some contingencies being looked at by Parliament and all parties – we'll continue to discuss those issues because it's vital we should have that democratic process to enable the people of Scotland to choose their government.
"From the Government's point of view we want the election to go ahead in May."
If the election were to go ahead while coronavirus was not fully under control, questions have been raised about the ability of party members and supporters to canvas for votes, and around how the public can cast their ballots in a safe way.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel