THE Duke of Rothesay travelled to his Scottish home of Birkhall the day before the UK went into lockdown at a cost of nearly £20,000 to taxpayers, it has emerged.
Prince Charles took a private jet from Brize Norton to Aberdeen on Sunday, March 22 and after displaying symptoms the following day was tested for coronavirus.
He and the Duchess of Cornwall self-isolated at the Scottish residence after the positive test was returned.
The latest Sovereign Grant Report reveals some of the monarchy’s latest expenditure and has drawn criticism.
READ MORE: Coronavirus: Prince Charles out of self-isolation after fleeing to Scotland
Prince Andrew took a private flight to a golf tournament last July at a cost of £16,000 to the taxpayer.
Palace sources said there was no other way for him to make the trip, which came months before his car-crash Newsnight interview. Andrew was stripped off his Portrush patronage after the interview.
Princess Anne also took a £16,440 day trip to Rome to see Scotland play Italy in the Six Nations while serving as patron of the Scottish Rugby Association.
A palace source said that: "In this case the use of charter was deemed being the most appropriate ensuring the criteria security, efficiency and best value for money."
The reports show the royal family spent £650,000 on 188 short helicopter trips during the 2019-20 period.
The campaign group Republic’s CEO Graham Smith said: "The grant goes up and up every year, and can never go down. This is madness and the system must be scrapped."
"Public money should be allocated according to need, not just thrown at the royals because of what they want."
He added: "Why is the Government paying for Prince Andrew to go to golfing tournaments, or Princess Anne to attend a rugby match in Italy?"
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel