SCOTTISH transport giant FirstGroup has welcomed a big-money extension to its cross-border rail contract.
The UK Government has scrapped rail franchising and will continue to use public cash to support train firms through the pandemic.
The 18-month move benefits Aberdeen-based First and a number of other companies, but has been slammed by unions.
READ MORE: We didn’t learn our lesson with oil ... now Scotland is paying the price
At least £3.5 billion has been spent since the UK Department for Transport (DfT) took on the revenue and cost risks of franchise holders in March. It has now switched current operators to “transitional contracts” and promises to develop a “simpler and more effective structure” in the coming months.
However, “significant taxpayer support will still be needed” under the new Emergency Recovery Management Agreements (ERMAs), the department said. It went on: “Ministers today ended rail franchising after 24 years as the first step in bringing Britain’s fragmented network back together.”
Rail firms will continue to be paid a management fee for running services, but under the ERMAs it will be a maximum of up to 1.5% of the franchise cost base, rather than 2% under the Emergency Measures Agreements introduced in March.
Transport Secretary Grant Shapps said: “The model of privatisation adopted 25 years ago has seen significant rises in passenger numbers, but this pandemic has proven that it is no longer working.
“Our new deal for rail demands more for passengers. It will simplify people’s journeys, ending the uncertainty and confusion about whether you are using the right ticket or the right train company.”
READ MORE: How Scottish farmers are being forced out of business by mega dairies
First owns four affected UK rail franchises – South Western Railway, the TransPennine Express and the West Coast Partnership – which comprises the cross-border Avanti West Coast and HS2 shadow operations.
A similar agreement for its Great Western Railway came into force earlier this month.
It says passenger numbers remain at 70% below pre-pandemic levels.
Its chief executive Matthew Gregory said: “We are pleased that the vital nature of rail services to communities and local economies is being recognised.
“Passengers can be confident that public transport is safe and across our rail networks we have increased service levels to provide more capacity as schools restart and many more workplaces and other facilities reopen.
"We are now operating around 90% of the rail services we were prior to the pandemic. We will continue to bring all our expertise to bear alongside Government and industry partners to deliver the next phase of recovery of the rail network.
“Together with the earlier GWR extension, these agreements reinforce our balance sheet position and provide a potential path for our rail business to move onto a new contractual footing over time, with a more appropriate balance of risk and reward for all parties.
"We have long advocated for a more sustainable long-term approach to the railway, with passengers at its centre, and we look forward to working constructively with the DfT to make this a reality.”
However, Mick Cash of the Rail, Maritime and Transport union claimed “private rail companies are a waste of time and a waste of money” and “public ownership is the only model that works”.
And Harish Patel of Unite said: “The Government should be permanently re-nationalising rail services to increase services, improve punctuality and reduce ticket prices.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here