CONTROVERSIAL new legislation proposed by Boris Johnson’s Government could be a way of eroding the Barnett formula – the process for determining funding for Scotland and the other devolved nations – MSPs have been warned.
Economics expert Professor David Bell told a Holyrood committee the new Internal Market Bill – which the Scottish Government says is a power grab – would give ministers in London powers to allocate spending in a “wide range” of areas in Scotland.
He claimed the UK Government could even directly fund bodies set up by Scottish ministers.
Bell told the Scottish Parliament’s Finance and Constitution Committee that new spending powers in the legislation raise “possibilities for bypassing effectively the Scottish Government”.
The University of Stirling academic said: “The powers proposed in the bill are extremely wide in relation to financial support.
“The UK Government is now taking power effectively to spend across a wide range of different topics and deliver that money to ‘any person’, that is the phrase that is specifically used within the bill.”
READ MORE: Internal Market Bill aims to distract from UK's coronavirus failures, EU says
He said this proposal has been “parachuted into the debate without any previous discussion or negotiation”.
This could result in UK ministers allocating cash to areas usually funded by the Scottish Government, with concerns it might be a way of “getting around the Barnett formula”, which also determines Westminster funding for Wales and Northern Ireland.
Bell said he believes it “may still be possible” that non-departmental public bodies – which he said were like “the children of the Scottish Government” – could receive funding from the UK Government under the legislation.
“I’m thinking of bodies like Skills Development Scotland, which have received large amounts of European funding in the past,” he added.
Bell told the committee: “The Barnett formula is not written in law, this may be a way of trying to erode it.”
Meanwhile, committee convener Bruce Crawford said he is “genuinely dismayed” UK Business Secretary Alok Sharma has refused to make time to give evidence to MSPs about the legislation.
It comes after an email from Sharma’s office explained that “given the tight legislative timeline for the Bill, it is with regret that the SoS (Secretary of State) will be unable to attend this committee session”.
Crawford said: “The UK Internal Market Bill will affect many people’s lives and livelihoods in Scotland.
“It will also have a profound impact on the devolution settlement and on the powers of the Scottish Parliament.
READ MORE: Disbelief as Boris Johnson claims Scots voted against new powers in 2014
“The UK Government already recognises and accepts that all aspects of this bill require the legislative consent of the Scottish Parliament.
“I am genuinely dismayed, therefore, that the Secretary of State for Business will not make time to give evidence to our committee, as we consider whether or not to recommend that consent be given to this UK bill.”
But Cabinet Office minister Michael Gove – who has previously said the legislation will result in a “power surge” to the devolved administrations – will be available to give evidence to the committee.
The Scottish Government has said it will not give its consent to the legislation, which has passed its first Commons hurdle despite a Tory rebellion after ministers admitted the bill breached international law.
NFU Scotland policy director Jonathan Hall also gave evidence to the committee. He said part of the bill – which aims to ensure smooth trade can continue between the four UK nations when the EU transition period ends – could be replaced with voluntary frameworks.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel