LABOUR have accused Nicola Sturgeon’s top official of "secrecy" and “evasion” after she refused to say how much the Scottish Government’s legal battle with Alex Salmond cost taxpayers.
Leslie Evans, the Scottish Government’s Permanent Secretary, insisted it was “not possible” to quantify the expense of the court case – which the Scottish Government lost when the Court of Session ruled part of the way it dealt with the allegations against the former first minister to be “unlawful”
While the court awarded £512,000 to the former SNP leader, Scottish Labour depute leader Jackie Baillie demanded to know the total cost to the Scottish Government.
Baillie said: “The committee and the general public deserve to know how much taxpayers’ money was frittered away on the judicial review.
“We know that the cost is in the hundreds of thousands but the true extent has not yet been revealed.
“The cost for external legal advice was £118,000 and that was on top of the £512,000 paid to Mr Salmond and his lawyers.
“It is not rocket science for the Permanent Secretary to work out the cost to the Scottish Government of the attendance of a number of civil servants at all the meetings about the judicial review.”
However in a letter to the Committee on the Scottish Government Handling of Harassment Complaints – which is probing how the allegations were dealt with – Ms Evans insisted it was “not possible to provide this figure”.
She told the committee: “Dealing with this case was part of the normal range of duties undertaken by a number of different civil servants, including lawyers in the Scottish Government legal directorate.
“Civil servants receive a salary rather than being separately remunerated for dealing with particular matters. In addition, they do not record the proportion of their time that they spend working on particular matters as a matter of course.”
Evans stated: “It is therefore not possible to say how much was paid to lawyers or other civil servants employed by the Scottish Government for dealing with this matter.”
Baillie, a member of the committee, branded that response as “another exercise in evasion”.
She added: “If the committee is to uncover the truth about this sorry affair then the evasion and secrecy must end.”
A Scottish Government spokesman said: “The Scottish Government has already published the litigation and legal costs for the judicial review.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel