EDUCATION Secretary John Swinney has said the SQA plans to run a full exam diet in 2021.
Exams in schools were cancelled this year due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
Teacher predictions were moderated by the SQA, resulting in a methodology that disproportionately affected pupils from deprived backgrounds.
A week after exam results were sent out, Swinney announced that grades would be reverted back to original teacher predictions.
As a result of the changes, the National 5 pass rate was 88.9%, the Higher pass rate was 89.2% and the Advanced Higher pass rate was 93.1% - up from 78.2%, 74.8% and 79.4% respectively in 2019.
Compared with the moderated results, these increased by 7.8, 10.3 and 5.5 percentage points respectively.
READ MORE: Ofqual boss steps down sparking calls for Gavin Williamson to follow
In a Q&A with the National Parent Forum of Scotland today, Swinney announced that plans were currently to hold a full exam diet in 2021.
He said: "Our objective is to run a full 2021 exam diet.
"SQA have consulted on what steps they could take to reduce the burden of assessments before the exam diet - what elements could be removed.
"We've also looked at the timetable of exams. Do they need to start in late April? Could they start at the end of May, giving them an extra month for learning and teaching.
"We've looked at those and the SQA is currently considering the response."
Swinney added that his main priority was fairness, saying: "I can't foresee how much disruption there will be between now and next spring, either on individual, class or school-level.
"I am determined to ensure every student has fairness and a fair crack at the whip next year, no matter their experience."
Swinney also apologised again for the "stress and anxiety" caused by the moderated grades.
He said: "When it became apparent there were a number of unfair outcomes, I took the decision to direct the SQA to base exam results on the basis of teacher estimates, to recognise the challenges pupils faced.
"I recognise that it caused a lot of stress and anxiety on young people and I reiterate my apology for that.
"We didn't want to cause that stress and for that I unreservedly apologise."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here