A NUMBER of prospective SNP candidates fear they could be barred from standing for Holyrood in a row over vetting.
Anyone wishing to be a candidate for next May's election must subject themselves to the party’s "robust consideration" by Monday.
Any activist who has not been vetted by the deadline will be allowed to stand.
It’s understood this strict time limit also applies to appeals.
One candidate who described themselves as a “occasional troublemaker,” told The National she had still not been vetted despite applying weeks ago.
Her fear was that the HQ could fail her in the vetting process over the weekend, leaving her with only limited time to appeal.
“I’m not sure if this is incompetence or a plot to stop anyone who might be a bit awkward, but either way, it’s not great. Especially given how far behind we are with candidate selection compared to just about every other party. Selection should be a matter for local members”.
Chris McEleny, who is mounting a challenge to Inverclyde MSP Stuart McMillan, said he too was waiting to hear.
He told The National: “This is an internal process that I am sure has just been a busy time for all those responsible for it, but as someone who has just stood down from leading the SNP on a local authority for the best part of a decade, as well as taking part in national leadership contests for the party, and who was approved to stand in next years Holyrood election only just last year, I’m confident I meet all the competencies required of potential SNP Parliamentary candidates.”
An SNP spokesperson said: "We’ve had a terrific response to our call for candidate applications, and so it takes time to give them all robust consideration.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel