SCOTLAND'S Constitution Secretary has denied the SNP Government undermined the UK's Brexit talks by urging both sides to compromise on the fishing sector.
UK Government trade officials are said to be furious at the Scottish Government, claiming minsters intervened in negotiations and made the talks harder.
Regular discussions, separate to the Brexit negotiations, are held between First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, other UK Government ministers and the EU's chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier.
According to The Times, sources at Westminster said they "called out" their Holyrood counterparts during an official catch-up between the Scottish and UK governments for apparently saying "both sides need to move a bit".
READ MORE: Brexit deal chaos has made UK 'laughing stock of the world’
A UK Government source told the newspaper: "This behaviour does not just undermine the UK Government, it undermines Scotland and its fishermen by stopping the UK from speaking as one voice to say that we want to be an independent coastal state once again."
Asked about the story, Mike Russell told BBC Radio Scotland he will continue to call for compromise.
He said: "I think what the UK is saying is that we've attempted to disrupt negotiations - they've actually been able to do that themselves without any difficulty, they didn't need our help to do so.
"But what actually has happened is part of the normal conversation that the Scottish Government has had with the EU over the past four years, and at all times we've stressed the need to compromise on both sides."
Negotiations over fishing rights have proved to be a contentious area in Brexit trade talks, with a key pillar of the campaign to exit the EU focusing on leaving the Common Fisheries Policy and regaining sovereignty and control of the waters around the UK.
Currenty fishing fleets of every country involved have full access to each other's waters, apart from the first 12 nautical miles out from the coast, with quotas set each year about how much they can catch.
David Frost, the UK's Brexit envoy, has tabled plans that would double the amount British fishermen can catch in the UK's coastal waters. The proposals are thought to be considered unrealistic by EU negotiators.
The Scottish Fishermen's Federation (SFF) and National Federation of Fishermen's Organisation (NFFO) issued a statement last week backing the UK Government's stance and arguing the UK must have "full control" over access to British waters for Brexit to be a success.
As fear grows the Brexit negotiations could end without a deal, Russell said it is "not true" this outcome could benefit Scotland's fishing industry.
He said: "You can have a vast amount of fish but if you cannot sell them to people and you cannot process them because you cannot get the staff - and the end of freedom of movement is already creating those difficulties - then it doesn't mean that you've got any significant advantage at all."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel