BORIS Johnson's Minister of State for the Constitution and Devolution has been forced to speak out over coronavirus conspiracy theory posts by her husband.
Chloe Smith, who represents Norwich North, was appointed to the ministerial position by Johnson in February.
Now she's been forced to issue a statement after her husband claimed coronavirus is a "mental illness".
Banking executive Sandy McFadzean, who married Smith in 2013, attended last weekend's huge London march against coronavirus restrictions.
The Unite For Freedom March called for an end to social distancing, track and trace, and the use of face masks.
McFadzean, a vice president for Credit Suisse, has previously retweeted posts describing the government as "globalist puppets" and "tyrants", according to reports by the Eastern Daily Press.
He wrote on Twitter: "Covid-19 is most likely an outbreak of mental illness."
A further post read: "Government need to be clear.
"Either there is a killer virus on the loose or there isn't. (Spoiler alert: There isn't)."
The newspaper, which covers Smith's local area, said the Twitter account was deleted on Wednesday after it contacted the minister for comment.
Distancing herself from the comments, she told the paper: "My husband's a private citizen.
"Everyone's entitled to their own view, and to debate.
"I take a different view."
The Conservative Party has not responded to requests for comment. Credit Suisse declined to comment.
Smith changed her Twitter account name during the pandemic to reflect the Government's policy, Stay Alert Save Lives.
Clive Lewis, Labour MP for Norwich South, said: "There's absolutely no way I'd hold anyone responsible for the views of their partner.
"However, if my partner was spouting forth Covid conspiracy, anti-vaccination nonsense, it is very likely the subject might come up for discussion at some point over tea."
Councillor Natasha Harpley, leader of Broadland Labour Group, said on Twitter: "Chloe Smith is not her husband's keeper but wow, how embarrassing.
"What an insult to the 1000s who have died & those experiencing actual mental ill health.
"I hope his ignorance hasn't compromised the health of both her & those she meets whilst carrying out MP duties."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel