THE leadership of Scottish Labour is less important than the positions the party holds, particularly on independence, the First Minister has said.
Current leader Richard Leonard has come under pressure to quit after four MSPs expressed their desire for a new leader yesterday and a member of the Westminster shadow cabinet said he should "consider his position" today.
Shadow Cabinet Office minister Rachel Reeves said opinion polls in Scotland were "pretty dire for Labour".
A defiant Leonard has said he will lead the party into next year's Holyrood election, despite slumping poll numbers that could see his group fall further behind the Conservatives.
READ MORE: Labour: Keir Starmer ally tells Richard Leonard to consider his position
Speaking on Sky News, the First Minister said she has "lost count" of the number of leaders Scottish Labour has had in Holyrood.
She added: "It doesn't seem to make much difference.
"I've got no view one way or the other on whether Richard Leonard should be leader of Scottish Labour or somebody else.
"Scottish Labour has got many more fundamental issues - they're at sea on the key issue of Scotland's future and most people in Scotland don't really know what Scottish Labour is for.
"I think until they answer that question, and until they get a position that distinguishes them from the Conservatives on the matter of Scotland's future, they can have as many leaders as they like, but they're going to continue to find it really hard to make any impact on Scottish politics."
Speaking on Thursday morning, Leonard said he was "confident I have got the backing of the members of the Scottish Labour Party, who elected me just under three years ago", adding that the "best chance" for Labour next year was to rally behind his leadership.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel